Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 726

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploration of porous metal–organic frameworks for gas separation and purification

Open access
Lin, Rui-Biao, Xiang, Shengchang, Xing, Huabin, Zhou, Wei, Chen, Banglin·2019·Coordination Chemistry Reviews

Abstract

As a new generation of porous materials, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs, also known as porous coordination polymers) have shown great promise for gas separation and purification because of their unique pore structures and surfaces for their differential recognition of small gas molecules. In this review article, we summarize our ongoing research endeavors to explore and discover microporous MOFs for gas separation and purification. We have developed several approaches to systematically tune the pores and to immobilize functional sites, including (1) the primitive cubic net of interpenetrated microporous MOFs from the self-assembly of the paddle-wheel clusters, M2(CO2)4(M=Cu2+,Zu2+…)), with two types of organic dicarboxylic acid and pillar bidentate linkers; (2) microporous mixed-metal–organic frameworks (M0 MOFs) through the metallo-ligands, and (3) microporous MOFs with dual functionalities. Such efforts have enabled us to make some breakthroughs on microporous MOFs for gas separation and purification, as demonstrated in the gas chromatographic separation of hexane isomers, kinetic D2/H2 separation, acetylene/ethylene separation, carbon dioxide capture, C2H2/CO2 and C3H4/C3H6 separation. Our group is one of the first groups who have envisioned the practical promise of microporous MOFs for the industrial gas separation and examined their separation capacities and efficiency using the fixed-bed adsorption and/or breakthrough experiments. Some of the very important and representative examples of these microporous MOFs for diverse gas separation and purification are highlighted in this review.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 726

Metadata

Authors
Lin, R.-B., Xiang, S., Xing, H., Zhou, W., & Chen, B.
Venue
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
378
Pages
87-103
ISSN
0010-8545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2764246269
Cited by
726
References
2
FWCI
23.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploration of porous metal–organic frameworks for gas separation and purification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.027
The paper
Lin, R.-B., Xiang, S., Xing, H., Zhou, W., & Chen, B. (2019). Exploration of porous metal–organic frameworks for gas separation and purification. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.