The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploration of porous metal–organic frameworks for gas separation and purification
Open accessAbstract
As a new generation of porous materials, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs, also known as porous coordination polymers) have shown great promise for gas separation and purification because of their unique pore structures and surfaces for their differential recognition of small gas molecules. In this review article, we summarize our ongoing research endeavors to explore and discover microporous MOFs for gas separation and purification. We have developed several approaches to systematically tune the pores and to immobilize functional sites, including (1) the primitive cubic net of interpenetrated microporous MOFs from the self-assembly of the paddle-wheel clusters, M2(CO2)4(M=Cu2+,Zu2+…)), with two types of organic dicarboxylic acid and pillar bidentate linkers; (2) microporous mixed-metal–organic frameworks (M0 MOFs) through the metallo-ligands, and (3) microporous MOFs with dual functionalities. Such efforts have enabled us to make some breakthroughs on microporous MOFs for gas separation and purification, as demonstrated in the gas chromatographic separation of hexane isomers, kinetic D2/H2 separation, acetylene/ethylene separation, carbon dioxide capture, C2H2/CO2 and C3H4/C3H6 separation. Our group is one of the first groups who have envisioned the practical promise of microporous MOFs for the industrial gas separation and examined their separation capacities and efficiency using the fixed-bed adsorption and/or breakthrough experiments. Some of the very important and representative examples of these microporous MOFs for diverse gas separation and purification are highlighted in this review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Seven chemical separations to change the world
Sholl, D. S., & Lively, R. P. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/532435a · Cited by 4,769
He, Y., Krishna, R., & Chen, B. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22858k · Cited by 674
Self-citation
Cited by
Porous metal-organic frameworks for gas storage and separation: Status and challenges
Li, H., Li, L., Lin, R.-B., Zhou, W., Zhang, Z., Xiang, S., & Chen, B. (2019) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2019.100006 · Cited by 891
Self-citationGong, Y., Jiao, L., Qian, Y., Pan, C., Zheng, L., Cai, X., Liu, B., Yu, S., & Jiang, H. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201914977 · Cited by 592
Isoreticular chemistry within metal–organic frameworks for gas storage and separation
Fan, W., Zhang, X., Kang, Z., Liu, X., & Sun, D. (2021) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213968 · Cited by 584
Wang, Y., Peh, S. B., & Zhao, D. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201900058 · Cited by 342
Yang, H., Wang, Y., Krishna, R., Jia, X., Wang, Y., Hong, A. N., Dang, C., Castillo, H. E., Bu, X., & Feng, P. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b12924 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, R.-B., Xiang, S., Xing, H., Zhou, W., & Chen, B.
- Venue
- Coordination Chemistry Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 378
- Pages
- 87-103
- ISSN
- 0010-8545 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2764246269
- Cited by
- 726
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploration of porous metal–organic frameworks for gas separation and purification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.027
- The paper
- Lin, R.-B., Xiang, S., Xing, H., Zhou, W., & Chen, B. (2019). Exploration of porous metal–organic frameworks for gas separation and purification. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.