Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progress of nanostructured metal oxides derived from metal–organic frameworks as anode materials for lithium–ion batteries

Reddy, R. Chenna Krishna, Lin, Jia, Chen, Yueying, Zeng, Chenghui, Lin, Xiaoming, Cai, Yuepeng, Su, Cheng-Yong·2020·Coordination Chemistry Reviews

Abstract

Abstract Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are the newly crystalline porous materials with outstanding structural, compositional, and morphological features, which have garnered much attention in all dimensions of major scientific and engineering fields, including energy storage and conversion. Various pristine MOFs and their derivatives have been developed and used as anode materials in lithium–ion batteries (LIBs). In this review, we specifically focused on MOFs–derived nanostructured metal oxides with diverse structural and compositional features that exhibit exceptional lithium storage capacity. These intriguing nanostructures inherit the multidimensional structure of MOF and the advantage of even distribution of metallic species after thermal decomposition, which facilitates fast reaction kinetics of lithium transportation and ultimately improves the battery performance. Herein, we review and categorise the synthetic strategies to achieve various transitional metal oxide nanostructures/composites obtained from BDC/BTC–based MOFs (H2BDC = 1,4–benzenedicarboxylic acid, H3BTC = 1,3,5–benzenetricarboxylic acid), zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), Prussian blue and Prussian blue analogues (PB and PBAs), and other unusual porous crystalline MOF materials. In addition, we will also compare the electrochemical performances of various metal oxides (MOs) nanostructures obtained via heteroatom doping in the pristine MOF precursor or by tuning their structure. Finally, our discussion will focus on the advantages and future developments in design and fabrication of new MOF–derived metal oxide electrode materials with high energy efficiencies in relation with the next generation rechargeable battery applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213434

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 129 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Reddy, R. C. K., Lin, J., Chen, Y., Zeng, C., Lin, X., Cai, Y., & Su, C.-Y.
Venue
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
420
Pages
213434
ISSN
0010-8545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038794666
Cited by
257
References
129
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress of nanostructured metal oxides derived from metal–organic frameworks as anode materials for lithium–ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213434
The paper
Reddy, R. C. K., Lin, J., Chen, Y., Zeng, C., Lin, X., Cai, Y., & Su, C.-Y. (2020). Progress of nanostructured metal oxides derived from metal–organic frameworks as anode materials for lithium–ion batteries. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213434

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.