Cited by 45Obesity and Health PracticesDiabetes Management and EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Research aimed at improving both mood and weight (RAINBOW) in primary care: A type 1 hybrid design randomized controlled trial

Open access
Ma, Jun, Yank, Veronica, Lv, Nan, Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D., Lewis, Megan A., Kramer, M. Kaye, Snowden, Mark B., Rosas, Lisa G. +2 more·2015·Contemporary Clinical Trials

Abstract

Effective interventions targeting comorbid obesity and depression are critical given the increasing prevalence and worsened outcomes for patients with both conditions. RAINBOW is a type 1 hybrid design randomized controlled trial. The objective is to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness and implementation potential of an integrated, technology-enhanced, collaborative care model for treating comorbid obesity and depression in primary care. Obese and depressed adults (n = 404) will be randomized to usual care enhanced with the provision of a pedometer and information about the health system's services for mood or weight management (control) or with the Integrated Coaching for Better Mood and Weight (I-CARE) program (intervention). The 12-month I-CARE program synergistically integrates two proven behavioral interventions: problem-solving therapy with as-needed intensification of pharmacotherapy for depression (PEARLS) and standardized behavioral treatment for obesity (Group Lifestyle Balance(™)). It utilizes traditional (e.g., office visits and phone consults) and emerging care delivery modalities (e.g., patient web portal and mobile applications). Follow-up assessments will occur at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. We hypothesize that compared with controls, I-CARE participants will have greater improvements in weight and depression severity measured by the 20-item Depression Symptom Checklist at 12 months, which will be sustained at 24 months. We will also assess I-CARE's cost-effectiveness and use mixed methods to examine its potential for reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. This study offers the potential to change how obese and depressed adults are treated-through a new model of accessible and integrative lifestyle medicine and mental health expertise-in primary care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RAINBOW/ENGAGE studies reported on an intervention designed for the management of both weight and depression, but the mobile app was exclusively for recording physical activity and did not include recording of any mental dimension.

    “The RAINBOW/ENGAGE studies [44, 45] reported on an intervention designed for the management of both weight and depression. Yet, the use of a mobile app was exclusively for recording physical activity and did not include the recording of any mental dimension.”

    From Mobile Apps for the Management of Comorbid Overweight/Obesity and Depression/Anxiety: A Systematic Review (2020) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Methods (§2.6.1) confirm that RAINBOW’s intervention was designed to treat both obesity and depression. But §2.6.3.1 contradicts the claim that the apps were exclusively for recording physical activity: participants could also log weight and dietary intake. The paper describes depression tracking in the EHR and an online care-team database, not in the participant apps. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Of the four randomized controlled trials, only the study by Ma et al. was blind.

    “Although the other four studies [44, 45, 49, 50] were randomized controlled trials, only the study by Ma and colleagues [45] was blind.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 108 · Cited by 45

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [81]Ma J Yank V Xiao L Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for weight loss into primary care: A randomized trial Arch Intern Med 2012 accepted for publication PMC3856315 23229846

Authors
Ma, J., Yank, V., Lv, N., Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D., Lewis, M. A., Kramer, M. K., Snowden, M. B., Rosas, L. G., Xiao, L., & Blonstein, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Palo Alto Medical Foundation (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Ma, Jun
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
43
Pages
260-278
ISSN
1551-7144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W621764348
Cited by
45
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (R01HL119453)
  • Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute
  • NIH/NIA (K01AG037593-01A1)
  • NIDDK (K23DK097308)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
obesity, depression, collaborative care, primary care, pedometers, problem-solving therapy, pearls, behavioral weight management, mobile health, web portal, cost-effectiveness, implementation, lifestyle medicine, mood management
MeSH terms
Affect, Age Factors, Antidepressive Agents, Behavior Therapy, Body Weight, Combined Modality Therapy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Primary Health Care, Research Design, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Body Mass Index, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review