Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education

Bernacki, Matthew L., Greene, Jeffrey A., Crompton, Helen·2020·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Abstract

Abstract Studying mobile learning – the use of personal electronic devices to engage in learning across multiple contexts via connections to media, educators, peers, experts, and the larger world – is a relatively new academic enterprise. In this special issue, we interrogated the promise and unexamined expectations of mobile learning, the theories and ideas developing around it, and the devices that afford it. The articles introduce mobile and wearable technologies as key components of empirical research and demonstrate ways that learning conducted with such devices (1) affects the process and products of learning via interactions with other psychological constructs; (2) affords new opportunities to directly influence learning process or outcomes; and (3) provides opportunities to collect previously unobtainable data that improve understanding and modeling of the learning process. In this introduction, we overview the emergence of mobile learning theory and its contemporary conceptualization. Then we highlight ways that mobile technologies can be used to enhance learning processes and an understanding of them. All special issue contributors conceptualize and align their work with both psychological theories of learning and instruction as well as emerging theories of mobile learning. The commentary authors appraise mobile learning research critically and analytically, and recommend ways mobile learning theory might build upon research methodology and knowledge grounded empirically in psychological and sociocultural theories of learning. Overall, we believe this special issue achieved our goal to produce a balanced consideration that highlights the advancements in learning and learning theory mobile devices might afford, and to temper any premature enthusiasm about these potential benefits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. ISTE. (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers: Second edition. Eugene, OR: ISTE.
  2. Kantar, M., & Dogan, M. (2015). Development of Mobile Learning Material for 9th Grade Physics Course To Use in FATIH Project: Force and Motion Unit.Participatory Educational Research. Retrieved from <http://www.partedres.com/archieve/spi_15_2/12_per_15_spi_2_12_Page_99_109.pdf>. · doi:10.17275/per.15.spi.2.12
  3. Khaddage, 2016, Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings via mobile app technology: Where to from here, and how?, Educational Technology & Society, 19, 16
  4. Kim, J. H., Katz, A., Lambert, J., & Brown, T. (2014, March). A Flipped Classroom Professional Development Initiative of Mathematizing Reading Instruction for Primary and Elementary Grade Mathematics Teachers. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference(pp. 1916–1919). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  5. Laouris, Y., & Eteokleous, N. (2005). We need an educational relevant definition of mobile learning. Paper presented at mLearn, 2005, 4th World Conference on Mobile Learning, Cape Town, South Africa.
  6. Lutze, R., & Waldhör, K. (2015, October). A smartwatch software architecture for health hazard handling for elderly people. In Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), 2015 International Conference (pp. 356-361). IEEE. · doi:10.1109/ichi.2015.50
  7. Nakasugi, H., & Yamauchi, Y. (2002, December). Past viewer: Development of wearable learning system for history education. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 1311–1312). IEEE. · doi:10.1109/cie.2002.1186223
  8. Tuhkala, 2018, Using Slack for computer-mediated communication to support higher education students’ peer interactions during Master’s thesis seminar, Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2379, 10.1007/s10639-018-9722-6 · DOI

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H.
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
60
Pages
101827
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990247485
Cited by
484
References
91
FWCI
45.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827
The paper
Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., & Crompton, H. (2020). Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.