The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancement of the degradation of atrazine through CoFe2O4 activated peroxymonosulfate (PMS) process: Kinetic, degradation intermediates, and toxicity evaluation
Abstract
Abstract The degradation performance of atrazine by peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activated by CoFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) in heterogeneous catalytic process was studied in our study. In this work, first of all, influences of vital parameters (i.e., CoFe2O4 dose, PMS dose, initial pH, co-existing anion, and atrazine (ATZ) concentration) on ATZ removal were investigated systematically. The removal of ATZ (>99%) and first order reaction kinetic rate constant (Kobs = 0.181 min−1) were achieved after 30 min reaction with 0.4 g/L CoFe2O4, 0.8 mM PMS, and 10 mg/L ATZ at initial pH 6.3. In contrast, only 10% and 6% ATZ removal were achieved with PMS and CoFe2O4, respectively, verifying the excellent performance in the CoFe2O4/PMS system. In addition, reusability of the CoFe2O4 NPs was investigated after five successive runs. Radical quenching experiments were done and SO4 − was identified as the main radical species. The fresh and used CoFe2O4 NPs were characterized via SEM, EDS, XRD and XPS techniques. What’s more, the possible degradation intermediates in CoFe2O4/PMS system were determined by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometry. Activated sludge inhibition experiment was carried out to evaluate the variation of toxicity of the ATZ and its degradation intermediates in the oxidation process. Based on the identified products, the degradation pathway of ATZ in CoFe2O4/PMS system was put forward. Finally, the believable reaction mechanism of CoFe2O4/PMS system was proposed according to the comprehensive analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Cited by
Wang, S., Liu, Y., & Wang, J. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c03256 · Cited by 412
Sun, Y., Xie, H., Zhou, C., Wu, Y., Pu, M., & Niu, J. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122827 · Cited by 108
Ren, W., Huang, X., Wang, L., Liu, X., Zhou, Z., Wang, Y., Lin, C., He, M., & Ouyang, W. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.131876 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Xu, M., Yao, G., & Lai, B.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 348
- Pages
- 1012-1024
- ISSN
- 1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801208774
- Cited by
- 739
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancement of the degradation of atrazine through CoFe2O4 activated peroxymonosulfate (PMS) process: Kinetic, degradation intermediates, and toxicity evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.032
- The paper
- Li, J., Xu, M., Yao, G., & Lai, B. (2018). Enhancement of the degradation of atrazine through CoFe2O4 activated peroxymonosulfate (PMS) process: Kinetic, degradation intermediates, and toxicity evaluation. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.