The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Radiation-induced degradation of sulfamethoxazole in the presence of various inorganic anions
Abstract
Abstract The effect of common inorganic anions (chloride, bicarbonate, carbonate, nitrate, sulfate and phosphate) on the radiation-induced degradation of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) was investigated. In the absence of anions, the removal efficiency of SMX reached 99.6% at dose of 1 kGy. However, the presence of inorganic anions had obvious influence on SMX degradation, which was dependent on their initial concentrations. Nitrate ions had inhibitive effect, which increased with increase of its initial concentration. Chloride ions showed no obvious inhibition at low concentration, while they had significant inhibition at higher concentration. For bicarbonate, carbonate and phosphate ions, they presented inhibition at low concentration, while they had enhancing effect at higher concentration. The promotion of SMX removal efficiency was observed when the initial concentration of bicarbonate, carbonate and phosphate was 50, 20 and 50 mM, respectively. Quenching experiments proved that hydroxyl radicals made a major contribution to SMX degradation in the absence of anions. However, in the presence of 50 mM of carbonate or phosphate ions, carbonate and phosphate radicals played a key role in SMX degradation. In addition, carbonate and phosphate radicals preferentially attacked the amino group and resulted in the formation of different intermediate products compared to hydroxyl radicals. The results suggested that the effect of inorganic anions on the radiation-induced degradation of sulfonamides antibiotics should be considered when radiation technology is used for the treatment of industrial wastewater.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.059 · Cited by 4,087
Self-citationYang, Y., Lu, X., Jiang, J., Ma, J., Liu, G., Cao, Y., Liu, W., Li, J., Pang, S., Kong, X., et al. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.054 · Cited by 637
Cited by
Reactive Species in Advanced Oxidation Processes: Formation, Identification and Reaction Mechanism
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126158 · Cited by 1,585
Self-citationWang, J., & Wang, S. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.128392 · Cited by 1,332
Self-citationWang, J., Chu, L., Wojnárovits, L., & Takács, E. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140997 · Cited by 895
Self-citationWang, S., Liu, Y., & Wang, J. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c03256 · Cited by 412
Self-citationSun, Y., Xie, H., Zhou, C., Wu, Y., Pu, M., & Niu, J. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122827 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, S., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 351
- Pages
- 688-696
- ISSN
- 1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2810885761
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiation-induced degradation of sulfamethoxazole in the presence of various inorganic anions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.137
- The paper
- Wang, S., & Wang, J. (2018). Radiation-induced degradation of sulfamethoxazole in the presence of various inorganic anions. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.