Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Photoconversion of U(VI) by TiO2: An efficient strategy for seawater uranium extraction

Li, Ping, Wang, Jingjing, Wang, Yun, Liang, Jianjun, He, Bihong, Pan, Duoqiang, Fan, Qiaohui, Wang, Xiangke·2019·Chemical Engineering Journal

Abstract

Abstract Uranium extraction from seawater is of significant importance for the sustainable utilization of uranium in the near future; however, several challenges remain owing to the low uranium concentration and high salinity of seawater. In this work, for the first time, photocatalysis by TiO2 was introduced for U(VI) extraction from seawater. The photocatalysis method achieved a high uranium extraction capacity of 3960 mg/g without saturation. To evaluate the performance of the photocatalysis in the potential real applications, the influence of environmental factors was systematically studied. The results showed that H+ in solution competed with U(VI) ions for the photogenerated e−, inhibiting U(VI) photoreduction. Inversely, U(VI) photoreduction was facilitated at pH > 6.0 and was adequate for U(VI) extraction from seawater. The efficiency of U(VI) photoreduction can also be inhibited by the high initial U(VI) concentration, high salinity, and high TiO2 dose. Methanol can accelerate U(VI) photoreduction by consuming photogenerated holes. Similarly, humic acid can promote U(VI) photoreduction at acidic conditions, and the reaction efficiency was slightly hindered over pH ∼ 6.5. Although the photoactivity was inhibited to some extent under specific conditions, it was proven that U(VI) could be completely extracted in all systems by increasing the irradiation time. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption near edge structure confirmed that U(VI) was transformed into U(IV) during photocatalysis and that UO2 was mainly formed on the TiO2 surface. The extraction of uranium in real seawater is also feasible and the deposited uranium could be easily recovered using a Na2CO3 solution after standing in air for several hours. Therefore, photocatalysis is demonstrated to be an eco-friendly, facile, economical and sustainable approach for uranium extraction from seawater.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.013

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Li, P., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Liang, J., He, B., Pan, D., Fan, Q., & Wang, X.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
365
Pages
231-241
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912793966
Cited by
299
References
34
FWCI
12.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photoconversion of U(VI) by TiO2: An efficient strategy for seawater uranium extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.013
The paper
Li, P., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Liang, J., He, B., Pan, D., Fan, Q., & Wang, X. (2019). Photoconversion of U(VI) by TiO2: An efficient strategy for seawater uranium extraction. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.