The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Degradation difference of ofloxacin and levofloxacin by UV/H2O2 and UV/PS (persulfate): Efficiency, factors and mechanism
Abstract
Abstract Chiral quinolone antibiotics, as racemate and in enantiomerically form, have been attracted extensive attention due to their same molecular structure and different pharmacological properties and toxicity in environment. The present study focused on the difference of degradation efficiency and pathway of chiral antibiotics by different AOPs technology. The degradation behaviors and differences of chiral pollutants were firstly identified. Among them, UV/PS process exhibited the best performance for the elimination of chiral pollutants removal and reduction of total organic carbon (TOC). The degradation of ofloxacin and levofloxacin revealed pronounced pH dependence in UV/H2O2 and UV/PS processes, where the impact on Levofloxacin (LEV) was greater than that on Ofloxacin (OFLO). Only a slight variation of TOC was observed to be less than 50%, where the removal efficiencies were all above 96%. SO4•− generated in UV/PS process yields a greater mineralization of antibiotics than •OH in UV/H2O2 process. Cl−, NO3− and NOM had inhibitory effects on OFLO and LEV degradation in both processes, while SO42− showed positive effect on UV/PS degradation. Meanwhile, chairal antibiotics removal was dominated by •OH with the second-order rate constants of 3.97 × 109 and 2.48 × 109 M−1s−1 in UV/H2O2 process, while SO4•− played the key role in UV/PS system with second-order rate constants of 2.19 × 1010 and 2.66 × 1010 M−1s−1, respectively. The results of acute toxicity assay shown that OFLO exhibited higher acute toxicity than LEV, while TTC dehydrogenase activity of intermediate products of OFLO was lower than LEV. This study demonstrated that AOPs (especially UV/PS) were efficient for removing fluoroquinolone antibiotics, which can be considered as a clean and green method for the treatment of antibiotics-containing industrial wastewater.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Rate Constants for Reactions of Inorganic Radicals in Aqueous Solution
Neta, P., Huie, R. E., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555808 · Cited by 3,651
Rodriguez-Mozaz, S., Chamorro, S., Marti, E., Huerta, B., Gros, M., Sànchez-Melsió, A., Borrego, C. M., Barceló, D., & Balcázar, J. L. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.021 · Cited by 1,623
Cheng, M., Zeng, G., Huang, D., Lai, C., Xu, P., Zhang, C., & Liu, Y. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.001 · Cited by 1,250
Self-citationZhang, T., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Le Roux, J., Yang, Y., & Croué, J.-P. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es501218f · Cited by 798
Self-citationAntibiotics in the aquatic environments: A review of lakes, China
Liu, X., Lu, S., Guo, W., Xi, B., & Wang, W. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.271 · Cited by 665
Self-citationAntibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in global lakes: A review and meta-analysis
Yang, Y., Song, W., Lin, H., Wang, W., Du, L., & Xing, W. (2018) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.011 · Cited by 663
Xu, J., Xu, Y., Wang, H., Guo, C., Qiu, H., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Meng, W. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.040 · Cited by 654
Yang, Y., Lu, X., Jiang, J., Ma, J., Liu, G., Cao, Y., Liu, W., Li, J., Pang, S., Kong, X., et al. (2017) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.054 · Cited by 637
Removal of 2-MIB and geosmin using UV/persulfate: Contributions of hydroxyl and sulfate radicals
Xie, P., Ma, J., Liu, W., Zou, J., Yue, S., Li, X., Wiesner, M. R., & Fang, J. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.029 · Cited by 592
Cited by
Degradation of antibiotic pollutants by persulfate activated with various carbon materials
Gao, Y., Wang, Q., Ji, G., & Li, A. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.132387 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, X., Liu, Y., Lu, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, G., Guo, X., Guo, W., Zhang, T., & Xi, B.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 385
- Pages
- 123987
- ISSN
- 1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2997973473
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Degradation difference of ofloxacin and levofloxacin by UV/H2O2 and UV/PS (persulfate): Efficiency, factors and mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123987
- The paper
- Liu, X., Liu, Y., Lu, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, G., Guo, X., Guo, W., Zhang, T., & Xi, B. (2020). Degradation difference of ofloxacin and levofloxacin by UV/H2O2 and UV/PS (persulfate): Efficiency, factors and mechanism. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.