The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Degradation of ciprofloxacin using photo, sono, and sonophotocatalytic oxidation with visible light and low-frequency ultrasound: Degradation kinetics and pathways
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the degradation of an antibiotic ciprofloxacin (CPX) by the photocatalytic, sonocatalytic and sonophotocatalytic oxidation inside a novel multi-frequency reactor under low ultrasonic frequencies and visible light using N-doped TiO2 (N-TiO2) nanoparticles as the catalysts. The synthesized nanoparticles were characterized by XRD, FTIR, TEM, BET and UV–Vis reflectance spectroscopy. The average particle size of these nanoparticles was in the range of 12–18 nm. The effects of different operational parameters affecting the CPX degradation during these processes were studied. Maximum CPX degradation of 54.5%, 41.2%, and 44% was observed for photocatalysis, sonocatalysis and sonophotocatalysis under their individual optimum conditions after 210, 90, and 90 min respectively. The application of these doped catalysts improved the photocatalytic and sonocatalytic oxidation of CPX due to the improved visible light activity and extra nuclei for cavitation respectively. Further, a synergistic effect was observed by the simultaneous application of light and ultrasound in sonophotocatalytic oxidation in comparison to individual processes with a synergy index of 1.22. During the Sonophotocatalysis process, the simultaneous application of ultrasound and visible light was found more effective in comparison to their sequential or intermittent application. The degradation products in all three oxidation processes were identified, and potential degradation pathways are proposed. In addition, effect of real wastewater matrix on the process performance was also investigated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Degradation of dyes from aqueous solution by Fenton processes: a review
Nidheesh, P. V., Gandhimathi, R., & Ramesh, S. T. (2013) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-012-1385-z · Cited by 696
Cited by
Li, X., Wang, W., Dong, F., Zhang, Z., Han, L., Luo, X., Huang, J., Feng, Z., Chen, Z., Jia, G., et al. (2021) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c05354 · Cited by 357
C-,N- and S-Doped TiO2 Photocatalysts: A Review
Piątkowska, A., Janus, M., Szymański, K., & Mozia, S. (2021) · Catalysts · doi:10.3390/catal11010144 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Karim, A. V., & Shriwastav, A.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 392
- Pages
- 124853
- ISSN
- 1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3012739860
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Degradation of ciprofloxacin using photo, sono, and sonophotocatalytic oxidation with visible light and low-frequency ultrasound: Degradation kinetics and pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124853
- The paper
- Karim, A. V., & Shriwastav, A. (2020). Degradation of ciprofloxacin using photo, sono, and sonophotocatalytic oxidation with visible light and low-frequency ultrasound: Degradation kinetics and pathways. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.