The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stability of ZIF-8 nanopowders in bacterial culture media and its implication for antibacterial properties
Abstract
Abstract The stability and degradation characteristics of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) in liquid media dictate their use in biomedical engineering applications. In this study, the antibacterial property of a zinc-based MOF, zeolite imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8), against gram-negative Escherichia coli (E. coli) is studied in comparison with ZnO, a widely-used antimicrobial agent. Superior antibacterial property of ZIF-8 was demonstrated and the reason was elucidated by new insights on the stability of ZIF-8 in bacterial culture media. Contrary to the widely held notion that ZIF-8 is stable in aqueous media, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry and UV–Vis adsorption spectroscopy revealed the release of zinc ions and 2-methyilimidazolate molecules in the culture media. Electron microscopy and X-ray diffractometry revealed that the degradation of ZIF-8 is enhanced by the reaction of released zinc ions with phosphate ions in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or with organic moieties in Luria Bertani (LB) media, resulting in stronger antibacterial properties of ZIF-8 than that of ZnO. In fact, due to the affinity of ions and organic constituents in the cell media towards the building block of ZIF-8 structure, a higher amount of ZIF-8 degrades in LB and PBS media (70–80 wt%) than in pure water (22 wt%) after 24 h of immersion. The results of the present investigation strongly advocate the importance of stability study on MOFs in developing their biomedical applications, in terms of its efficacy, biosafety and eco-safety.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wiegand, I., Hilpert, K., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2008) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.521 · Cited by 6,156
Zhang, Y., Xie, Z., Wang, Z., Feng, X., Wang, Y., & Wu, A. (2016) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/c6dt01827k · Cited by 215
Cited by
Dai, S., Jiang, L., Liu, L., Su, Z., Yao, L., Yang, P., & Huang, N. (2024) · Regenerative Biomaterials · doi:10.1093/rb/rbae119 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Taheri, M., Ashok, D., Sen, T., Enge, T. G., Verma, N. K., Tricoli, A., Lowe, A., R. Nisbet, D., & Tsuzuki, T.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 413
- Pages
- 127511
- ISSN
- 1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3097464725
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability of ZIF-8 nanopowders in bacterial culture media and its implication for antibacterial properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127511
- The paper
- Taheri, M., Ashok, D., Sen, T., Enge, T. G., Verma, N. K., Tricoli, A., Lowe, A., R. Nisbet, D., & Tsuzuki, T. (2021). Stability of ZIF-8 nanopowders in bacterial culture media and its implication for antibacterial properties. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.