Biochar in Water and Wastewater Treatment—A Sustainability Assessment
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 314 · Cited by 226
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [92]92. Y. Tong, P.J. Mcnamara, B.K. Mayer, Environmental Science Water Research & Technology biochar : a review of relevant kinetics , mechanisms, Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 5 (2019) 821-838. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ew00938d. · DOI
- [154]154. N.K. Niazi, I. Bibi, M. Shahid, Y.S. Ok, E.D. Burton, H. Wang, S.M. Shaheen, J. Rinklebe, A. Lüttge, Arsenic removal by perilla leaf biochar in aqueous solutions and groundwater: An integrated spectroscopic and microscopic examination, Environ. Pollut. 232 (2018) 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.051. · DOI · Paper page
- [219]219. M. Kamali, M.E. V. Costa, G. Otero-Irurueta, I. Capela, M. Elisabete, V. Costa, G. Otero- Irurueta, I. Capela, Ultrasonic irradiation as a green production route for coupling crystallinity and high specific surface area in iron nanomaterials, J. Clean. Prod. 211 (2019) 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.127. · DOI
- [261]261. E.S. Azzi, E. Karltun, C. Sundberg, Prospective life cycle assessment of large-scale biochar production and use for negative emissions in stockholm, Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (2019) 8466-8476. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01615. · DOI
- [265]265. M.I. Inyang, B. Gao, Y. Yao, Y. Xue, A. Zimmerman, A. Mosa, P. Pullammanappallil, Y.S. Ok, X. Cao, A review of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aqueous heavy metal removal, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2016) 406-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2015.1096880. · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Kamali, M., Appels, L., Kwon, E. E., Aminabhavi, T. M., & Dewil, R.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Sejong University (KR)
- Karnatak University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Aminabhavi, Tejraj M.
- Dewil, Raf
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 420
- Pages
- 129946
- ISSN
- 1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3158034391
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 314
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 16
- FWCI
- 10.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- Locations
- Chemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- KU Leuven (PDM/19/104)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- biochar, water treatment, wastewater treatment, sustainability assessment, lignocellulosic biomass, pyrolysis, water contaminants, technology gap
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review