Physical UV-blocker TiO2 nanocomposites elevated toxicity of chemical sunscreen BP-1 under UV irradiation
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some chemical absorbers, such as 2,4-dihydroxy benzophenones, can break down into even more toxic products during UV irradiation in the presence of TiO2 nanocomposites.
“Some chemical absorbers, such as 2,4-dihydroxy benzophenones, can break down into even more toxic products during UV irradiation in the presence of TiO2 nanocomposites, which act as a physical UV-blocker [149].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Guo, Q., Wei, D., Zhao, C., Wang, C., Ma, H., & Du, Y.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- North Minzu University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wei, Dongbin
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-08
- Volume
- 469
- Pages
- 143899
- ISSN
- 1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4379618716
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Chemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Keywords
- TiO2 nanocomposites, 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone, UV irradiation, degradation intermediates, toxicity, Norrish type I reaction, hydroxylation, radical coupling, dibenzo-p-dioxins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review