Cited by 19Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsAdvanced oxidation water treatmentEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Physical UV-blocker TiO2 nanocomposites elevated toxicity of chemical sunscreen BP-1 under UV irradiation

Open access
Guo, Qiaorong, Wei, Dongbin, Zhao, Chuanfang, Wang, Cuiping, Ma, Haijun, Du, Yuguo·2023·Chemical Engineering Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2023.143899

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 19

Authors
Guo, Q., Wei, D., Zhao, C., Wang, C., Ma, H., & Du, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • North Minzu University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wei, Dongbin
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
469
Pages
143899
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4379618716
Cited by
19
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
TiO2 nanocomposites, 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone, UV irradiation, degradation intermediates, toxicity, Norrish type I reaction, hydroxylation, radical coupling, dibenzo-p-dioxins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review