Enhanced treatment of perfluoroalkyl acids in groundwater by membrane separation and electrochemical oxidation
Open accessAbstract
This work explores the treatment of poly- and perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in groundwater by coupling membrane separation and electrochemical oxidation (ELOX). A process system engineering approach based on modelling and empirical data was followed. Two nanofiltration (NF90) and reverse osmosis (BW30) membranes were characterized for treating an electrolyte (NaCl and CaSO4) mixture of perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFCAs) containing PFOA, PFHpA, PFHxA, PFPeA and PFBA with initial concentrations of 10 µg L−1 each. Membrane surface charge shielding and concentration polarization negatively influenced NF90 performance, and the BW30 membrane was selected. Electrochemical oxidation with boron doped diamond anodes treated the PFCAs mixture amended with PFOS and 6:2 FTSA, emulating previously pre-concentrated feed and non-preconcentrated feed conditions. Working at different current densities (J) between 20 and 350 A m−2, the removal of PFOA, PFOS and 6:2 FTSA followed first order apparent kinetics, although shorter chain PFCAs initially showed increasing trends because of their simultaneous electrogeneration and degradation. Overall, ΣPFAA electrolysis followed first order kinetics linearly correlated to J in the full range of testing. Unexpectedly, PFAAs electrolysis was faster for the low conductive non-preconcentrated feed, a result that was ascribed to the enhanced direct electron transfer mechanism resulting from the higher cell voltage. For 99.9% PFAAs removal, the total specific cost of treatment was minimized using a cascade of four RO stages and ELOX treatment of the concentrate, to reach ΣPFAA below the Health Advisory Levels recommended by the USEPA in drinking water (<70 ng L−1 sum of PFOA and PFOS).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Soriano et al. concluded, based on optimization modeling implementing empirical lab-scale data, that to remove 99.9% PFAAs and achieve ΣPFAAs below 70 ng/L, the total specific cost of treatment could be reduced utilizing a cascade of four RO pre-concentration stages and electrochemical oxidation treatment of the concentrate.
“Based on an optimization modeling implementing empirical data obtained in the lab-scale study, it was concluded that to remove 99.9% PFAAs and achieve ΣPFAAs below 70 ng/L, the total specific cost of treatment could be reduced utilizing a cascade of four RO pre-concentration stages and electrochemical oxidation treatment of the concentrate [59].”
From A Mini-Review of Full-Scale Drinking Water Treatment Plants for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Removal: Possible Solutions and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 82
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- W.J. Backe, T.C. Day, J.A. Field, Zwitterionic, cationic, and anionic fluorinated chemicals in aqueous film forming foam formulations and groundwater from U.S. military bases by nonaqueous large-volume injection HPLC-MS/MS, Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013) 5226-5234, doi: 10.1021/es3034999 . · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Soriano, A., Schaefer, C., & Urtiaga, A.
- Affiliations
- CDM Smith (United States) (US)
- Universidad de Cantabria (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Urtiaga, Ane
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Journal Advances
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 100042
- ISSN
- 2666-8211 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3093718484
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Chemical Engineering Journal Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UCrea (University of Cantabria) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación (PID2019-105827RB-I00)
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (CTM2016-75509-R, SPAIN-FEDER 2014-2020)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
- Keywords
- perfluoroalkyl acids, groundwater treatment, electrochemical oxidation, membrane separation, nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, boron-doped diamond anode, perfluorocarboxylic acids, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, concentration polarization, direct electron transfer, first-order kinetics, treatment cost minimization, drinking water contamination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review