Cited by 209Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysProtein Degradation and InhibitorsEnzyme Structure and Function

Suprafacial Orientation of the SCFCdc4 Dimer Accommodates Multiple Geometries for Substrate Ubiquitination

Open access
Tang, Xiaojing, Orlicky, Stephen, Lin, Zhenyuan, Willems, Andrew, Neculai, Dante, Ceccarelli, Derek, Mercurio, Frank, Shilton, Brian H. +2 more·2007·Cell

Abstract

SCF ubiquitin ligases recruit substrates for degradation via F box protein adaptor subunits. WD40 repeat F box proteins, such as Cdc4 and beta-TrCP, contain a conserved dimerization motif called the D domain. Here, we report that the D domain protomers of yeast Cdc4 and human beta-TrCP form a superhelical homotypic dimer. Disruption of the D domain compromises the activity of yeast SCF(Cdc4) toward the CDK inhibitor Sic1 and other substrates. SCF(Cdc4) dimerization has little effect on the affinity for Sic1 but markedly stimulates ubiquitin conjugation. A model of the dimeric holo-SCF(Cdc4) complex based on small-angle X-ray scatter measurements reveals a suprafacial configuration, in which substrate-binding sites and E2 catalytic sites lie in the same plane with a separation of 64 A within and 102 A between each SCF monomer. This spatial variability may accommodate diverse acceptor lysine geometries in both substrates and the elongating ubiquitin chain and thereby increase catalytic efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 209

Authors
Tang, X., Orlicky, S., Lin, Z., Willems, A., Neculai, D., Ceccarelli, D., Mercurio, F., Shilton, B. H., Sicheri, F., & Tyers, M.
Affiliations
  • Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute (CA)
  • Celgene (United States) (US)
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Sicheri, Frank
  • Tyers, Mike
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
129
Issue
6
Pages
1165-1176
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967986514
Cited by
209
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (RR08630)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
SCF ubiquitin ligase, Cdc4, β-TrCP, WD40 repeats, F-box protein, D domain, Sic1, ubiquitination, ubiquitin chain elongation, protein-protein interaction
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Molecular Conformation, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Cell Cycle Proteins, Dimerization, Catalytic Domain, Ubiquitin, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, F-Box Proteins, SKP Cullin F-Box Protein Ligases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review