Cited by 484Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Writing Memories with Light-Addressable Reinforcement Circuitry

Open access
Claridge-Chang, Adam, Roorda, Robert D., Vrontou, Eleftheria, Sjulson, Lucas, Li, Haiyan, Hirsh, Jay, Miesenböck, Gero·2009·Cell

Abstract

Dopaminergic neurons are thought to drive learning by signaling changes in the expectations of salient events, such as rewards or punishments. Olfactory conditioning in Drosophila requires direct dopamine action on intrinsic mushroom body neurons, the likely storage sites of olfactory memories. Neither the cellular sources of the conditioning dopamine nor its precise postsynaptic targets are known. By optically controlling genetically circumscribed subsets of dopaminergic neurons in the behaving fly, we have mapped the origin of aversive reinforcement signals to the PPL1 cluster of 12 dopaminergic cells. PPL1 projections target restricted domains in the vertical lobes and heel of the mushroom body. Artificially evoked activity in a small number of identifiable cells thus suffices for programming behaviorally meaningful memories. The delineation of core reinforcement circuitry is an essential first step in dissecting the neural mechanisms that compute and represent valuations, store associations, and guide actions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.034

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 484

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Berg HC Ecoli in motion New York Springer 2004
  2. Holland JH 1986 Michalski RS Carbonell JG Mitchell TM Escaping brittleness: The possibilities of general purpose learning algorithms applied to parallel rule-based systems Machine learning Los Altos Morgan Kaufmann 593 623

Authors
Claridge-Chang, A., Roorda, R. D., Vrontou, E., Sjulson, L., Li, H., Hirsh, J., & Miesenböck, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Miesenböck, Gero
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
139
Issue
2
Pages
405-415
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137171341
Cited by
484
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 31
FWCI
13.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017297, R01DA030601)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
dopaminergic neurons, olfactory conditioning, aversive reinforcement, mushroom body, vertical lobe, Drosophila, optogenetics, memory storage, postsynaptic targets
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Conditioning, Classical, Dopamine, Drosophila melanogaster, Electric Stimulation, Memory, Neurons, Olfactory Pathways, Mushroom Bodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review