Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 860

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Census of Human Soluble Protein Complexes

Open access
Havugimana, Pierre C., Hart, G. Traver, Nepusz, Tamás, Yang, Haixuan, Turinsky, Andrei L., Li, Zhihua, Wang, Peggy I., Boutz, Daniel R., Fong, Vincent, Phanse, Sadhna, Babu, Mohan, Craig, Stephanie A., Hu, Pingzhao, Wan, Cuihong, Vlasblom, James, Dar, Vaqaar-un-Nisa, Bezginov, Alexandr, Clark, Gregory W., Wu, Gabriel C., Wodak, Shoshana J., Tillier, Elisabeth R.M., Paccanaro, Alberto, Marcotte, Edward M., Emili, Andrew·2012·Cell

Abstract

SUMMARY Cellular processes often depend on stable physical associations between proteins. Despite recent progress, knowledge of the composition of human protein complexes remains limited. To close this gap, we applied an integrative global proteomic profiling approach, based on chromatographic separation of cultured human cell extracts into more than one thousand biochemical fractions which were subsequently analyzed by quantitative tandem mass spectrometry, to systematically identify a network of 13,993 high-confidence physical interactions among 3,006 stably-associated soluble human proteins. Most of the 622 putative protein complexes we report are linked to core biological processes, and encompass both candidate disease genes and unnanotated proteins to inform on mechanism. Strikingly, whereas larger multi-protein assemblies tend to be more extensively annotated and evolutionarily conserved, human protein complexes with 5 or fewer subunits are far more likely to be functionally un-annotated or restricted to vertebrates, suggesting more recent functional innovations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.011

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 860

Metadata

Authors
Havugimana, P. C., Hart, G. T., Nepusz, T., Yang, H., Turinsky, A. L., Li, Z., Wang, P. I., Boutz, D. R., Fong, V., Phanse, S., Babu, M., Craig, S. A., Hu, P., Wan, C., Vlasblom, J., Dar, V.-U.-N., Bezginov, A., Clark, G. W., Wu, G. C., Wodak, S. J., Tillier, E. R. M., Paccanaro, A., Marcotte, E. M., & Emili, A.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
150
Issue
5
Pages
1068-1081
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143892509
Cited by
860
References
15
FWCI
26.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Census of Human Soluble Protein Complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.011
The paper
Havugimana, P. C., Hart, G. T., Nepusz, T., Yang, H., Turinsky, A. L., Li, Z., Wang, P. I., Boutz, D. R., Fong, V., Phanse, S., Babu, M., Craig, S. A., Hu, P., Wan, C., Vlasblom, J., Dar, V.-U.-N., Bezginov, A., Clark, G. W., Wu, G. C., . . . Emili, A. (2012). A Census of Human Soluble Protein Complexes. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.