Cited by 188Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesInsect Pheromone Research and Control

A bidirectional circuit switch reroutes pheromone signals in male and female brains

Open access
Kohl, Johannes, Ostrovsky, Aaron D., Frechter, Shahar, Jefferis, Gregory S.X.E.·2013·Cell

Abstract

The Drosophila sex pheromone cVA elicits different behaviors in males and females. First- and second-order olfactory neurons show identical pheromone responses, suggesting that sex genes differentially wire circuits deeper in the brain. Using in vivo whole-cell electrophysiology, we now show that two clusters of third-order olfactory neurons have dimorphic pheromone responses. One cluster responds in females; the other responds in males. These clusters are present in both sexes and share a common input pathway, but sex-specific wiring reroutes pheromone information. Regulating dendritic position, the fruitless transcription factor both connects the male-responsive cluster and disconnects the female-responsive cluster from pheromone input. Selective masculinization of third-order neurons transforms their morphology and pheromone responses, demonstrating that circuits can be functionally rewired by the cell-autonomous action of a switch gene. This bidirectional switch, analogous to an electrical changeover switch, provides a simple circuit logic to activate different behaviors in males and females.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.025

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 188

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ostrovsky, A.D. (2011). A sexually dimorphic olfactory circuit in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Authors
Kohl, J., Ostrovsky, A. D., Frechter, S., & Jefferis, G. S. X. E.
Affiliations
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
Corresponding author
Jefferis, Gregory S.X.E.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
155
Issue
7
Pages
1610-1623
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063699128
Cited by
188
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23
FWCI
8.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
Keywords
sex pheromone, stroke, Drosophila, olfactory circuitry, masculinization, sex differences in behavior, switch genes
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Male, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Pheromones, Sex Characteristics, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review