Large-Scale Genetic Perturbations Reveal Regulatory Networks and an Abundance of Gene-Specific Repressors
Open accessAbstract
To understand regulatory systems, it would be useful to uniformly determine how different components contribute to the expression of all other genes. We therefore monitored mRNA expression genome-wide, for individual deletions of one-quarter of yeast genes, focusing on (putative) regulators. The resulting genetic perturbation signatures reflect many different properties. These include the architecture of protein complexes and pathways, identification of expression changes compatible with viability, and the varying responsiveness to genetic perturbation. The data are assembled into a genetic perturbation network that shows different connectivities for different classes of regulators. Four feed-forward loop (FFL) types are overrepresented, including incoherent type 2 FFLs that likely represent feedback. Systematic transcription factor classification shows a surprisingly high abundance of gene-specific repressors, suggesting that yeast chromatin is not as generally restrictive to transcription as is often assumed. The data set is useful for studying individual genes and for discovering properties of an entire regulatory system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Loss of all other SWI/SNF subunits tested also sensitised S. cerevisiae to azole antifungals, except for snf11Δ and swp82Δ.
“Loss of all other SWI/SNF subunits tested also sensitised S. cerevisiae to azole antifungals, except for snf11Δ and swp82Δ in which PDR5 mRNA levels were not reduced44 (Fig. 5k and Supplementary Fig. 6d, e).”
From SWI/SNF and the histone chaperone Rtt106 drive expression of the Pleiotropic Drug Resistance network genes (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 122 · Cited by 277
- Authors
- Kemmeren, P., Sameith, K., van de Pasch, L. A. L., Benschop, J. J., Lenstra, T. L., Margaritis, T., O’Duibhir, E., Apweiler, E., van Wageningen, S., Ko, C. W., van Heesch, S., Kashani, M. M., Ampatziadis-Michailidis, G., Brok, M. O., Brabers, N. A. C. H., Miles, A. J., Bouwmeester, D., van Hooff, S. R., van Bakel, H., Sluiters, E., Bakker, L. V., Snel, B., Lijnzaad, P., van Leenen, D., Groot Koerkamp, M. J. A., & Holstege, F. C. P.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Holstege, Frank C.P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 740-752
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994267372
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 11.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- gene perturbation, gene deletion, gene regulatory networks, feed-forward loop, transcription factors, transcriptional regulation, protein complexes, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, chromatin accessibility
- MeSH terms
- Genetic Techniques, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Deletion, Gene Regulatory Networks, Gene Knockout Techniques, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review