Cited by 277Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisFungal and yeast genetics researchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Large-Scale Genetic Perturbations Reveal Regulatory Networks and an Abundance of Gene-Specific Repressors

Open access
Kemmeren, Patrick, Sameith, Katrin, van de Pasch, Loes A.L., Benschop, Joris J., Lenstra, Tineke L., Margaritis, Thanasis, O’Duibhir, Eoghan, Apweiler, Eva +18 more·2014·Cell

Abstract

To understand regulatory systems, it would be useful to uniformly determine how different components contribute to the expression of all other genes. We therefore monitored mRNA expression genome-wide, for individual deletions of one-quarter of yeast genes, focusing on (putative) regulators. The resulting genetic perturbation signatures reflect many different properties. These include the architecture of protein complexes and pathways, identification of expression changes compatible with viability, and the varying responsiveness to genetic perturbation. The data are assembled into a genetic perturbation network that shows different connectivities for different classes of regulators. Four feed-forward loop (FFL) types are overrepresented, including incoherent type 2 FFLs that likely represent feedback. Systematic transcription factor classification shows a surprisingly high abundance of gene-specific repressors, suggesting that yeast chromatin is not as generally restrictive to transcription as is often assumed. The data set is useful for studying individual genes and for discovering properties of an entire regulatory system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 122 · Cited by 277

Authors
Kemmeren, P., Sameith, K., van de Pasch, L. A. L., Benschop, J. J., Lenstra, T. L., Margaritis, T., O’Duibhir, E., Apweiler, E., van Wageningen, S., Ko, C. W., van Heesch, S., Kashani, M. M., Ampatziadis-Michailidis, G., Brok, M. O., Brabers, N. A. C. H., Miles, A. J., Bouwmeester, D., van Hooff, S. R., van Bakel, H., Sluiters, E., Bakker, L. V., Snel, B., Lijnzaad, P., van Leenen, D., Groot Koerkamp, M. J. A., & Holstege, F. C. P.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Holstege, Frank C.P.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
157
Issue
3
Pages
740-752
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994267372
Cited by
277
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
gene perturbation, gene deletion, gene regulatory networks, feed-forward loop, transcription factors, transcriptional regulation, protein complexes, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, chromatin accessibility
MeSH terms
Genetic Techniques, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Deletion, Gene Regulatory Networks, Gene Knockout Techniques, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review