The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low Affinity Binding Site Clusters Confer Hox Specificity and Regulatory Robustness
Open accessAbstract
In animals, Hox transcription factors define regional identity in distinct anatomical domains. How Hox genes encode this specificity is a paradox, because different Hox proteins bind with high affinity in vitro to similar DNA sequences. Here, we demonstrate that the Hox protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx) in complex with its cofactor Extradenticle (Exd) bound specifically to clusters of very low affinity sites in enhancers of the shavenbaby gene of Drosophila. These low affinity sites conferred specificity for Ubx binding in vivo, but multiple clustered sites were required for robust expression when embryos developed in variable environments. Although most individual Ubx binding sites are not evolutionarily conserved, the overall enhancer architecture-clusters of low affinity binding sites-is maintained and required for enhancer function. Natural selection therefore works at the level of the enhancer, requiring a particular density of low affinity Ubx sites to confer both specific and robust expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Another means by which flexible enhancer grammar ensures robust gene expression control is through “suboptimal” TF binding motifs, which reinforce the requirement for TF cooperativity and create opportunities for fine-tuning enhancer activity levels [125–128].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [126]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila
Lewis, E. B. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/276565a0 · Cited by 3,813
Homeobox genes and axial patterning
McGinnis, W., & Krumlauf, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n · Cited by 2,674
Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle inDrosophila melanogaster
N�sslein-Volhard, C., Wieschaus, E. F., & Kluding, H. (1984) · Development Genes and Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00848156 · Cited by 1,552
The role of DNA shape in protein–DNA recognition
Rohs, R., West, S. M., Sosinsky, A., Liu, P., Mann, R. S., & Honig, B. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08473 · Cited by 1,096
Self-citationNF-κB signaling pathways in mammalian and insect innate immunityPreprint
Silverman, N. S., & Maniatis, T. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.909001 · Cited by 904
The hardwiring of development: organization and function of genomic regulatory systems
Arnone, M. I., & Davidson, E. H. (1997) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.124.10.1851 · Cited by 693
Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle inDrosophila melanogaster
J�rgens, G., Wieschaus, E. F., N�sslein-Volhard, C., & Kluding, H. (1984) · Development Genes and Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00848157 · Cited by 683
The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo
Driever, W., & Nüsslein‐Volhard, C. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/337138a0 · Cited by 658
The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator
Struhl, G., Struhl, K., & Macdonald, P. M. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90062-7 · Cited by 633
Variation in Homeodomain DNA Binding Revealed by High-Resolution Analysis of Sequence Preferences
Berger, M. F., Badis, G., Gehrke, A. R., Talukder, S., Philippakis, A. A., Peña-Castillo, L., Alleyne, T. M., Mnaimneh, S., Botvinnik, O. B., Chan, E. T., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.024 · Cited by 606
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ever-Changing Landscapes: Transcriptional Enhancers in Development and Evolution
Long, H. K., Prescott, S. L., & Wysocka, J. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.018 · Cited by 945
“Interestingly, these sorts of enhancers often contain suboptimal binding sites that not only tolerate rapid motif turnover across species but that also may serve an important role in promoting enhancer specificity (Crocker et al., 2015; Farley et al., 2015).”
BackgroundBCL11A enhancer dissection by Cas9-mediated in situ saturating mutagenesis
Canver, M. C., Smith, E. C., Sher, F., Pinello, L., Sanjana, N. E., Shalem, O., Chen, D. D., Schupp, P. G., Vinjamur, D. S., Garcia, S. P., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15521 · Cited by 886
Transcriptional Responses to the Auxin Hormone
Weijers, D., & Wagner, D. (2016) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-112122 · Cited by 551
“Recent studies in Drosophila have uncovered an inverse relationship between the affinity of the binding site and its specificity for a given transcription factor (that is, low-affinity binding sites have the highest transcription factor specificity); moreover, clustered low-affinity sites contribute to the robustness…”
BackgroundHomeodomain proteins: an update
Bürglin, T. R., & Affolter, M. (2015) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-015-0543-8 · Cited by 454
“…regulation by HD proteins, recent evidence suggesting that clusters of low affinity sites also play important roles in gene regulation by HD proteins (Crocker et al. 2015) suggests that in silico searches using high-affinity sequences might miss many functionally relevant sites (see also below).”
BackgroundPioneer Transcription Factors Initiating Gene Network Changes
Zaret, K. S. (2020) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-030220-015007 · Cited by 409
“Clusters of suboptimal motifs are now understood to increase the cell-type specificity of enhancers in embryonic development (24, 35).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Crocker, J., Abe, N., Rinaldi, L., McGregor, A. P., Frankel, N., Wang, S., Alsawadi, A., Valenti, P., Plaza, S., Payre, F., Mann, R. S., & Stern, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Mann, Richard S.
- Stern, David L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 191-203
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4449256
- OpenAlex
- W2002964220
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 22
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-14-CE11-0010)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM054510, GM054510, R35GM118336)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- Hox transcription factors, Ultrabithorax, enhancer architecture, Drosophila embryogenesis, regional identity, transcriptional specificity, enhancer evolution
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Binding, Transcription Factors, Sequence Alignment, Homeodomain Proteins, Drosophila Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
