Cited by 223Autophagy in Disease and TherapyCellular transport and secretionCalcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism

A Kinase-Independent Role for EGF Receptor in Autophagy Initiation

Open access
Tan, Xiaojun, Thapa, Narendra, Sun, Yue, Anderson, Richard A.·2015·Cell

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is upregulated in numerous human cancers. Inhibition of EGFR signaling induces autophagy in tumor cells. Here, we report an unanticipated role for the inactive EGFR in autophagy initiation. Inactive EGFR interacts with the oncoprotein LAPTM4B that is required for the endosomal accumulation of EGFR upon serum starvation. Inactive EGFR and LAPTM4B stabilize each other at endosomes and recruit the exocyst subcomplex containing Sec5. We show that inactive EGFR, LAPTM4B, and the Sec5 subcomplex are required for basal and starvation-induced autophagy. LAPTM4B and Sec5 promote EGFR association with the autophagy inhibitor Rubicon, which in turn disassociates Beclin 1 from Rubicon to initiate autophagy. Thus, the oncoprotein LAPTM4B facilitates the role of inactive EGFR in autophagy initiation. This pathway is positioned to control tumor metabolism and promote tumor cell survival upon serum deprivation or metabolic stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 223

Authors
Tan, X., Thapa, N., Sun, Y., & Anderson, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Richard A.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
160
Issue
1-2
Pages
145-160
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052858451
Cited by
223
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 19
FWCI
21.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL051952)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA104708, CA104708)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM057549, GM 057549)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
Keywords
epidermal growth factor receptor, autophagy initiation, LAPTM4B, Rubicon, Beclin-1, serum deprivation, cancer metabolism, kinase-independent signaling, tumor cell survival
MeSH terms
Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Autophagy-Related Proteins, Beclin-1, Gefitinib, Autophagy, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Quinazolines, Endosomes, Oncogene Proteins, Vesicular Transport Proteins, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins, HEK293 Cells, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review