Cited by 310Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Human SRMAtlas: A Resource of Targeted Assays to Quantify the Complete Human Proteome

Open access
Kusebauch, Ulrike, Campbell, David S., Deutsch, Eric W., Chu, Caroline S., Spicer, Douglas A., Brusniak, Mi-Youn, Slagel, Joseph, Sun, Zhi +19 more·2016·Cell

Abstract

The ability to reliably and reproducibly measure any protein of the human proteome in any tissue or cell type would be transformative for understanding systems-level properties as well as specific pathways in physiology and disease. Here, we describe the generation and verification of a compendium of highly specific assays that enable quantification of 99.7% of the 20,277 annotated human proteins by the widely accessible, sensitive, and robust targeted mass spectrometric method selected reaction monitoring, SRM. This human SRMAtlas provides definitive coordinates that conclusively identify the respective peptide in biological samples. We report data on 166,174 proteotypic peptides providing multiple, independent assays to quantify any human protein and numerous spliced variants, non-synonymous mutations, and post-translational modifications. The data are freely accessible as a resource at http://www.srmatlas.org/, and we demonstrate its utility by examining the network response to inhibition of cholesterol synthesis in liver cells and to docetaxel in prostate cancer lines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.041

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Human SRMAtlas assay library enables targeted identification and quantification of a theoretical maximum of 99.7% of the human proteome, provided proteins are expressed spatiotemporally at concentrations amenable to MS detection.

    “This assay library enables targeted identification and quantification of a theoretical maximum of 99.7% of the human proteome36, provided proteins are expressed spatiotemporally at concentrations amenable to MS detection.”

    From A high-stringency blueprint of the human proteome (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

  • In silico analysis reveals only 22 human proteins cannot produce the characteristic >2 high-stringency proteotypic peptides of the required length after tryptic digestion.

    “In silico analysis reveals only 22 human proteins cannot produce the characteristic >2 high-stringency proteotypic peptides of the required length after tryptic digestion36.”

    From A high-stringency blueprint of the human proteome (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 310

Authors
Kusebauch, U., Campbell, D. S., Deutsch, E. W., Chu, C. S., Spicer, D. A., Brusniak, M.-Y., Slagel, J., Sun, Z., Stevens, J., Grimes, B., Shteynberg, D., Hoopmann, M. R., Blattmann, P., Ratushny, A. V., Rinner, O., Picotti, P., Carapito, C., Huang, C.-Y., Kapousouz, M., Lam, H., Tran, T., Demir, E., Aitchison, J. D., Sander, C., Hood, L., Aebersold, R., & Moritz, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Systems Biology (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Center for Infectious Disease Research (US)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Aebersold, Ruedi
  • Moritz, Robert L.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
166
Issue
3
Pages
766-778
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2488048472
Cited by
310
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 24
FWCI
29.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (130530)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (RC2HG005805, U41HG006623)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM109824, R01GM087221, P50GM076547)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10RR027584)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
human proteome, multiple reaction monitoring, targeted proteomics, proteotypic peptides, protein quantification, splice variants, non-synonymous mutations, post-translational modification, cholesterol synthesis inhibition, docetaxel, prostate cancer, hepatocytes
MeSH terms
Docetaxel, Antineoplastic Agents, Cholesterol, Female, Humans, Liver, Male, Mutation, Prostatic Neoplasms, RNA Splicing, Internet, Proteome, Access to Information, Databases, Protein, Taxoids, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review