Cited by 109Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Aneuploidy Causes Non-genetic Individuality

Open access
Beach, Rebecca R., Ricci-Tam, Chiara, Brennan, Christopher M., Moomau, Christine A., Hsu, Pei-hsin, Hua, Bo, Silberman, Rebecca E., Springer, Michael +1 more·2017·Cell

Abstract

Phenotypic variability is a hallmark of diseases involving chromosome gains and losses, such as Down syndrome and cancer. Allelic variances have been thought to be the sole cause of this heterogeneity. Here, we systematically examine the consequences of gaining and losing single or multiple chromosomes to show that the aneuploid state causes non-genetic phenotypic variability. Yeast cell populations harboring the same defined aneuploidy exhibit heterogeneity in cell-cycle progression and response to environmental perturbations. Variability increases with degree of aneuploidy and is partly due to gene copy number imbalances, suggesting that subtle changes in gene expression impact the robustness of biological networks and cause alternate behaviors when they occur across many genes. As inbred trisomic mice also exhibit variable phenotypes, we further propose that non-genetic individuality is a universal characteristic of the aneuploid state that may contribute to variability in presentation and treatment responses of diseases caused by aneuploidy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reversibility of aneuploidy offers a dynamic mechanism for fungi to balance adaptation and stability, in the population and for individuals.

    “Importantly, its reversibility offers a dynamic mechanism for fungi to balance adaptation and stability, in the population and for individuals [151,155].”

    From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [155]

    The Discussion section ‘Aneuploidy decreases robustness of biological networks’ (page not provided) reports variation among individual aneuploid yeast cells and notes that variation in fungal populations can benefit adaptation under stress. The cited paper does not establish that aneuploidy’s reversibility lets fungi balance adaptation with stability, either in populations or in individuals. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 109

Authors
Beach, R. R., Ricci-Tam, C., Brennan, C. M., Moomau, C. A., Hsu, P.-H., Hua, B., Silberman, R. E., Springer, M., & Amon, A.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Amon, Angelika
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
169
Issue
2
Pages
229-242.e21
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604944651
Cited by
109
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (CA206157, GM118066)
  • Koch Institute (P30-CA14051)
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships
  • National Science Foundation (1349248)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
aneuploidy, phenotypic heterogeneity, copy number variation, cell cycle progression, trisomy, Down syndrome, cancer, yeast, treatment response variability
MeSH terms
Aneuploidy, Animals, Cell Cycle, Cell Division, DNA Damage, Gene Expression Regulation, Kinetics, Phenotype, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genetic Heterogeneity, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review