Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 538

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CAG Repeat Not Polyglutamine Length Determines Timing of Huntington’s Disease Onset

Open access
Lee, Jong-Min, Correia, Kevin, Loupe, Jacob, Kim, Kyung-Hee, Barker, Douglas, Hong, Eun Pyo, Chao, Michael J., Long, Jeffrey D., Lucente, Diane, Vonsattel, Jean Paul G., Pinto, Ricardo Mouro, Abu Elneel, Kawther, Ramos, Eliana Marisa, Mysore, Jayalakshmi Srinidhi, Gillis, Tammy, Wheeler, Vanessa C., MacDonald, Marcy E., Gusella, James F., McAllister, Branduff, Massey, Thomas, Medway, Christopher, Stone, Timothy C., Hall, Lynsey, Jones, Lesley, Holmans, Peter, Kwak, Seung, Ehrhardt, Anka G., Sampaio, Cristina, Ciosi, Marc, Maxwell, Alastair, Chatzi, Afroditi, Monckton, Darren G., Orth, Michael, Landwehrmeyer, G. Bernhard, Paulsen, Jane S., Dorsey, E. Ray, Shoulson, Ira, Myers, Richard H.·2019·Cell

Abstract

Variable, glutamine-encoding, CAA interruptions indicate that a property of the uninterrupted HTT CAG repeat sequence, distinct from the length of huntingtin's polyglutamine segment, dictates the rate at which Huntington's disease (HD) develops. The timing of onset shows no significant association with HTT cis-eQTLs but is influenced, sometimes in a sex-specific manner, by polymorphic variation at multiple DNA maintenance genes, suggesting that the special onset-determining property of the uninterrupted CAG repeat is a propensity for length instability that leads to its somatic expansion. Additional naturally occurring genetic modifier loci, defined by GWAS, may influence HD pathogenesis through other mechanisms. These findings have profound implications for the pathogenesis of HD and other repeat diseases and question the fundamental premise that polyglutamine length determines the rate of pathogenesis in the "polyglutamine disorders."

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.036

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Cited by

See all 538

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J.-M., Correia, K., Loupe, J., Kim, K.-H., Barker, D., Hong, E. P., Chao, M. J., Long, J. D., Lucente, D., Vonsattel, J. P. G., Pinto, R. M., Abu Elneel, K., Ramos, E. M., Mysore, J. S., Gillis, T., Wheeler, V. C., MacDonald, M. E., Gusella, J. F., McAllister, B., Massey, T., Medway, C., Stone, T. C., Hall, L., Jones, L., Holmans, P., Kwak, S., Ehrhardt, A. G., Sampaio, C., Ciosi, M., Maxwell, A., Chatzi, A., Monckton, D. G., Orth, M., Landwehrmeyer, G. B., Paulsen, J. S., Dorsey, E. R., Shoulson, I., & Myers, R. H.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
178
Issue
4
Pages
887-900.e14
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969081693
Cited by
538
References
83
FWCI
23.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CAG Repeat Not Polyglutamine Length Determines Timing of Huntington’s Disease Onset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.036
The paper
Lee, J.-M., Correia, K., Loupe, J., Kim, K.-H., Barker, D., Hong, E. P., Chao, M. J., Long, J. D., Lucente, D., Vonsattel, J. P. G., Pinto, R. M., Abu Elneel, K., Ramos, E. M., Mysore, J. S., Gillis, T., Wheeler, V. C., MacDonald, M. E., Gusella, J. F., McAllister, B., . . . Myers, R. H. (2019). CAG Repeat Not Polyglutamine Length Determines Timing of Huntington’s Disease Onset. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.