Elicitation of Potent Neutralizing Antibody Responses by Designed Protein Nanoparticle Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
A safe, effective, and scalable vaccine is needed to halt the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We describe the structure-based design of self-assembling protein nanoparticle immunogens that elicit potent and protective antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 in mice. The nanoparticle vaccines display 60 SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domains (RBDs) in a highly immunogenic array and induce neutralizing antibody titers 10-fold higher than the prefusion-stabilized spike despite a 5-fold lower dose. Antibodies elicited by the RBD nanoparticles target multiple distinct epitopes, suggesting they may not be easily susceptible to escape mutations, and exhibit a lower binding:neutralizing ratio than convalescent human sera, which may minimize the risk of vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease. The high yield and stability of the assembled nanoparticles suggest that manufacture of the nanoparticle vaccines will be highly scalable. These results highlight the utility of robust antigen display platforms and have launched cGMP manufacturing efforts to advance the SARS-CoV-2-RBD nanoparticle vaccine into the clinic.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neutralising antibody titres appeared highly correlated with vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 rechallenge in non-human primates, and there was no correlation between T cell responses and protection.
“Neutralising antibody titres appeared to be highly correlated with vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 rechallenge in non-human primates, and importantly, there was no correlation between T cell responses (as measured by ELISpot) and protection38.”
From Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 to mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 124 · Cited by 532
- Authors
- Walls, A. C., Fiala, B., Schäfer, A., Wrenn, S., Pham, M. N., Murphy, M., Tse, L. V., Shehata, L., O’Connor, M. A., Chen, C., Navarro, M. J., Miranda, M. C., Pettie, D., Ravichandran, R., Kraft, J. C., Ogohara, C., Palser, A., Chalk, S., Lee, E.-C., Guerriero, K., Kepl, E., Chow, C. M., Sydeman, C., Hodge, E. A., Brown, B., Fuller, J. T., Dinnon, K. H., Gralinski, L. E., Leist, S. R., Gully, K. L., Lewis, T. B., Guttman, M., Chu, H. Y., Lee, K. K., Fuller, D. H., Baric, R. S., Kellam, P., Carter, L., Pepper, M., Sheahan, T. P., Veesler, D., & King, N. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Kymab (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Veesler, David
- King, Neil P.
- ORCID
- Walls, Alexandra C.
- Fiala, Brooke
- Schäfer, Alexandra
- Wrenn, Samuel
- Pham, Minh N.
- Murphy, Michael
- Tse, Longping V.
- Shehata, Laila
- O’Connor, Megan A.
- Chen, Chengbo
- Navarro, Mary Jane
- Miranda, Marcos C.
- Pettie, Deleah
- Ravichandran, Rashmi
- Palser, Anne
- Lee, E-Chiang
- Guerriero, Kathryn
- Kepl, Elizabeth
- Chow, Cameron M.
- Hodge, Edgar A.
- Dinnon, Kenneth H.
- Gralinski, Lisa E.
- Leist, Sarah R.
- Gully, Kendra L.
- Lewis, Thomas B.
- Chu, Helen Y.
- Lee, Kelly K.
- Fuller, Deborah H.
- Baric, Ralph S.
- Kellam, Paul
- Carter, Lauren
- Pepper, Marion
- Sheahan, Timothy P.
- Veesler, David
- King, Neil P.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1367-1382.e17
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7604136
- OpenAlex
- W3094860119
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 134 · 2020: 20
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus vaccines, spike protein receptor-binding domain, neutralizing antibodies, epitope diversity, cGMP production, structure-based vaccine design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review