Cited by 204Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Medial entorhinal cortex lesions only partially disrupt hippocampal place cells and hippocampus-dependent place memory

Open access
Hales, Jena B., Schlesiger, Magdalene I., Leutgeb, Jill K., Squire, Larry R., Leutgeb, Stefan, Clark, Robert E.·2014·Cell Reports

Abstract

The entorhinal cortex provides the primary cortical projections to the hippocampus, a brain structure critical for memory. However, it remains unclear how the precise firing patterns of medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) cells influence hippocampal physiology and hippocampus-dependent behavior. We found that complete bilateral lesions of the MEC resulted in a lower proportion of active hippocampal cells. The remaining active cells had place fields, but with decreased spatial precision and decreased long-term spatial stability. In addition, MEC rats were as impaired in the water maze as hippocampus rats, while rats with combined MEC and hippocampal lesions had an even greater deficit. However, MEC rats were not impaired on other hippocampus-dependent tasks, including those in which an object location or context was remembered. Thus, the MEC is not necessary for all types of spatial coding or for all types of hippocampus-dependent memory, but it is necessary for the normal acquisition of place memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 204

Authors
Hales, J. B., Schlesiger, M. I., Leutgeb, J. K., Squire, L. R., Leutgeb, S., & Clark, R. E.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Leutgeb, Stefan
  • Clark, Robert E.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
893-901
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995540943
Cited by
204
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P50AG005131)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH020002-13, R37MH024600, T32MH020002, R01MH024600, MH24600)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS086947)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
medial entorhinal cortex, place cells, place memory, entorhinal cortex lesion, hippocampal lesions, spatial coding, place fields, spatial precision, water maze, hippocampal-dependent memory, object location memory, contextual memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Neurons, Entorhinal Cortex, Maze Learning, Rats, Long-Evans, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review