SPATA2-Mediated Binding of CYLD to HOIP Enables CYLD Recruitment to Signaling Complexes
Open accessAbstract
Recruitment of the deubiquitinase CYLD to signaling complexes is mediated by its interaction with HOIP, the catalytically active component of the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC). Here, we identify SPATA2 as a constitutive direct binding partner of HOIP that bridges the interaction between CYLD and HOIP. SPATA2 recruitment to TNFR1- and NOD2-signaling complexes is dependent on HOIP, and loss of SPATA2 abolishes CYLD recruitment. Deficiency in SPATA2 exerts limited effects on gene activation pathways but diminishes necroptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor (TNF), resembling loss of CYLD. In summary, we describe SPATA2 as a previously unrecognized factor in LUBAC-dependent signaling pathways that serves as an adaptor between HOIP and CYLD, thereby enabling recruitment of CYLD to signaling complexes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Necroptosis relies on deubiquitinating activity of CYLD, which is also proteolytic target of CASP8.
“Accordingly, necroptosis relies on the deubiquitinating activity of CYLD [338], which is also a proteolytic target of CASP8 [494–496].”
From Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2018. (2018) · cites this paper as [494]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 135
- Authors
- Kupka, S., De Miguel, D., Draber, P., Martino, L., Surinova, S., Rittinger, K., & Walczak, H.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Walczak, Henning
- Venue
- Cell Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2271-2280
- ISSN
- 2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5009064
- OpenAlex
- W2517895740
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (508528)
- Francis Crick Institute (10142)
- Cancer Research UK (A17341, 17341)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
- Keywords
- CYLD, HOIP, LUBAC, TNFR1 signaling, NOD2 signaling, necroptosis, TNF-α, adaptor proteins, signaling complex assembly
- MeSH terms
- Deubiquitinating Enzyme CYLD, Animals, Binding Sites, Cloning, Molecular, Escherichia coli, Gene Expression Regulation, HeLa Cells, Humans, Macrophages, Plasmids, Protein Binding, Proteins, Recombinant Proteins, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Signal Transduction, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I, Mice, Nod2 Signaling Adaptor Protein, Primary Cell Culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review