Cited by 135NF-κB Signaling PathwaysUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysImmune Response and Inflammation

SPATA2-Mediated Binding of CYLD to HOIP Enables CYLD Recruitment to Signaling Complexes

Open access
Kupka, Sebastian, De Miguel, Diego, Draber, Peter, Martino, Luigi, Surinova, Silvia, Rittinger, Katrin, Walczak, Henning·2016·Cell Reports

Abstract

Recruitment of the deubiquitinase CYLD to signaling complexes is mediated by its interaction with HOIP, the catalytically active component of the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC). Here, we identify SPATA2 as a constitutive direct binding partner of HOIP that bridges the interaction between CYLD and HOIP. SPATA2 recruitment to TNFR1- and NOD2-signaling complexes is dependent on HOIP, and loss of SPATA2 abolishes CYLD recruitment. Deficiency in SPATA2 exerts limited effects on gene activation pathways but diminishes necroptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor (TNF), resembling loss of CYLD. In summary, we describe SPATA2 as a previously unrecognized factor in LUBAC-dependent signaling pathways that serves as an adaptor between HOIP and CYLD, thereby enabling recruitment of CYLD to signaling complexes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.086

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 135

Authors
Kupka, S., De Miguel, D., Draber, P., Martino, L., Surinova, S., Rittinger, K., & Walczak, H.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Walczak, Henning
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
2271-2280
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2517895740
Cited by
135
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 3
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (508528)
  • Francis Crick Institute (10142)
  • Cancer Research UK (A17341, 17341)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
CYLD, HOIP, LUBAC, TNFR1 signaling, NOD2 signaling, necroptosis, TNF-α, adaptor proteins, signaling complex assembly
MeSH terms
Deubiquitinating Enzyme CYLD, Animals, Binding Sites, Cloning, Molecular, Escherichia coli, Gene Expression Regulation, HeLa Cells, Humans, Macrophages, Plasmids, Protein Binding, Proteins, Recombinant Proteins, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Signal Transduction, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I, Mice, Nod2 Signaling Adaptor Protein, Primary Cell Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review