Circulating NOD1 activators and hematopoietic NOD1 contribute to metabolic inflammation and insulin resistance
Open accessAbstract
Insulin resistance is a chronic inflammatory condition accompanying obesity or high fat diets that leads to type 2 diabetes. It is hypothesized that lipids and gut bacterial compounds in particular contribute to metabolic inflammation by activating the immune system; however, the receptors detecting these "instigators" of inflammation remain largely undefined. Here, we show that circulating activators of NOD1, a receptor for bacterial peptidoglycan, increase with high fat feeding in mice, suggesting that NOD1 could be a critical sensor leading to metabolic inflammation. Hematopoietic depletion of NOD1 did not prevent weight gain but protected chimeric mice against diet-induced glucose and insulin intolerance. Mechanistically, while macrophage infiltration of adipose tissue persisted, notably these cells were less pro-inflammatory, had lower CXCL1 production, and consequently, lower neutrophil chemoattraction into the tissue. These findings reveal macrophage NOD1 as a cell-specific target to combat diet-induced inflammation past the step of macrophage infiltration, leading to insulin resistance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nod1 ligand derived from intestinal microbes gets into the circulation and modulates a range of biological activities in a Nod1-dependent manner.
“Nod1 ligand derived from intestinal microbes is known to get into the circulation and modulate a range of biological activities in a Nod1-dependent manner (Bouskra et al., 2008; Chan et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2019; Hergott et al., 2016; Iwamura et al., 2017).”
From Intestinal microbiota modulates adrenomedullary response through Nod1 sensing in chromaffin cells (2021) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Chan, K. L., Tam, T. H., Boroumand, P., Prescott, D., Costford, S. R., Escalante, N. K., Fine, N., Tu, Y., Robertson, S. J., Prabaharan, D., Liu, Z., Bilan, P. J., Salter, M. W., Glogauer, M., Girardin, S. E., Philpott, D. J., & Klip, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Klip, Amira
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2415-2426
- ISSN
- 2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2592710178
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MT-11219, TBO-122068, THC-135238)
- Banting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of Toronto
- Canada Research Chairs
- University of Toronto
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
- Keywords
- insulin resistance, metabolic inflammation, high-fat diet, macrophages, adipose tissue, CXCL1, neutrophil recruitment, type 2 diabetes, chimeric mice, obesity
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Animals, Cell Movement, Chemotactic Factors, Disease Models, Animal, Glucose, Hematopoiesis, Inflammation, Insulin Resistance, Macrophages, Obesity, Cell Polarity, Gene Deletion, Mice, Knockout, Neutrophil Infiltration, Mice, Nod1 Signaling Adaptor Protein, Chemokine CXCL1, Diet, High-Fat
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review