Cortical Interneurons Differentially Shape Frequency Tuning following Adaptation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Neurons throughout the sensory pathway are tuned to specific aspects of stimuli. This selectivity is shaped by feedforward and recurrent excitatory-inhibitory interactions. In the auditory cortex (AC), two large classes of interneurons, parvalbumin- (PVs) and somatostatin- positive (SOMs) interneurons, differentially modulate frequency-dependent responses across the frequency response function of excitatory neurons. At the same time, the responsiveness of neurons in AC to sounds is dependent on the temporal context, with the majority of neurons exhibiting adaptation to repeated sounds. Here, we asked whether and how inhibitory neurons shape the frequency response function of excitatory neurons as a function of adaptation to temporal repetition of tones. The effects of suppressing both SOMs and PVs diverged for responses to preferred versus non-preferred frequencies following adaptation. Prior to adaptation, suppressing either SOM or PV inhibition drove both increases and decreases in spiking activity among cortical neurons. After adaptation, suppressing SOM activity caused predominantly disinhibitory effects, whereas suppressing PV activity still evoked bi-directional changes. SOM, but not PV-driven inhibition dynamically modulated frequency tuning as a function of adaptation. Additionally, testing across frequency tuning revealed that, unlike PVs, SOM-driven inhibition exhibited gain-like increases reflective of adaptation. Our findings suggest that distinct cortical interneurons differentially shape tuning to sensory stimuli across the neuronal receptive field, maintaining frequency selectivity of excitatory neurons during adaptation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Optogenetic manipulations of interneurons provide evidence of cell type-specific effects of inhibitory interneurons on gain regulation.
“Optogenetic manipulations of interneurons provide evidence of cell type-specific effects of inhibitory interneurons on gain regulation2,68,104,105,107.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [105]
Adaptation enables high sensitivity to small changes in stimulus features over a large range of intensities and is found across sensory systems.
“Adaptation enables high sensitivity to small changes in stimulus features over a large range of intensities, and is found across sensory systems5,17,26,105,210–216.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [105]
In response to repeated auditory tones, excitatory neuron activity in mouse A1 adapts in a frequency-dependent manner, whereas responses of PV+ interneurons are stable and those of SST+ interneurons increase.
“For example, in response to repeated auditory tones, excitatory neuron activity in mouse A1 adapts in a frequency-dependent manner, whereas the responses of PV+ interneurons are stable and those of SST+ interneurons increase.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [105]
Increase in SST+ interneuron activity following adaptation results in enhanced gain modulation of excitatory neuron auditory responses, whereas PV+ interneurons do not affect adaptation-induced response gain.
“The increase in SST+ interneuron activity following adaptation results in enhanced gain modulation of excitatory neuron auditory responses, whereas PV+ interneurons do not affect the adaptation-induced response gain105.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [105]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Natan, R. G., Rao, W., & Geffen, M. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Geffen, Maria N.
- Venue
- Cell Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 878-890
- ISSN
- 2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5830304
- OpenAlex
- W2766979094
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- NIH (NIH R03DC013660, NIH R01DC014700, NIH R01DC015527, NIH NIMH T32MH017168)
- Klingenstein Award in Neuroscience
- Human Frontier in Science Foundation (RGY0073/2014)
- Pennsylvania Lions Club
- Burroughs Wellcome
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- auditory cortex, parvalbumin interneurons, somatostatin interneurons, inhibitory interneurons, frequency tuning, sensory adaptation, recurrent inhibition, excitatory-inhibitory interactions, disinhibition, gain modulation, receptive fields
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Auditory Cortex, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Interneurons, Male, Neural Inhibition, Parvalbumins, Somatostatin, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review