Cited by 89Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Isoform-Specific Destabilization of the Active Site Reveals a Molecular Mechanism of Intrinsic Activation of KRas G13D

Open access
Johnson, Christian W., Lin, Yi-Jang, Reid, Derion, Parker, Jillian, Pavlopoulos, Spiro, Dischinger, Patrick, Graveel, Carrie, Aguirre, Andrew J. +3 more·2019·Cell Reports

Abstract

Ras GTPases are mutated at codons 12, 13, and 61, with different frequencies in KRas, HRas, and NRas and in a cancer-specific manner. The G13D mutant appears in 25% of KRas-driven colorectal cancers, while observed only rarely in HRas or NRas. Structures of Ras G13D in the three isoforms show an open active site, with adjustments to the D13 backbone torsion angles and with disconnected switch regions. KRas G13D has unique features that destabilize the nucleotide-binding pocket. In KRas G13D bound to GDP, A59 is placed in the Mg 2+ binding site, as in the HRas-SOS complex. Structure and biochemistry are consistent with an intermediate level of KRas G13D bound to GTP, relative to wild-type and KRas G12D, observed in genetically engineered mouse models. The results explain in part the elevated frequency of the G13D mutant in KRas over the other isoforms of Ras.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.026

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 89

Authors
Johnson, C. W., Lin, Y.-J., Reid, D., Parker, J., Pavlopoulos, S., Dischinger, P., Graveel, C., Aguirre, A. J., Steensma, M., Haigis, K. M., & Mattos, C.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Van Andel Institute (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Steensma, Matthew
  • Haigis, Kevin M.
  • Mattos, Carla
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1538-1550.e7
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2965941158
Cited by
89
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
KRAS G13D, Ras GTPase, Ras isoforms, switch regions, colorectal cancer, RAS mutations, protein structure
MeSH terms
Animals, Colon, Female, Homeostasis, Humans, Hydrolysis, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Structure-Activity Relationship, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Protein Isoforms, Catalytic Domain, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review