Molecular basis for differential activation of p101 and p84 complexes of PI3Kγ by Ras and GPCRs
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Class IB phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3Kγ) is activated in immune cells by diverse stimuli and can form two distinct complexes, with the p110γ catalytic subunit binding to either p101 or p84 regulatory subunits. These two complexes are differentially activated by G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and Ras, but the molecular details of this activation are still unclear. Using a combination of X-ray crystallography, HDX-MS, EM, molecular modeling, and biochemical assays we reveal molecular differences between the two p110γ-p84 and p110γ-p101 complexes that explain their differential activation. The structure of p110γ-p84 shows a similar assembly to p110γ-p101 at the p110γ interface, however the interface in p110γ-p84 is dynamic and is evolutionarily conserved to be less stable compared to p110γ-p101. The p110γ-p84 complex is only weakly recruited to membranes by Gβγ subunits alone and requires recruitment by Ras to allow for Gβγ activation through an interaction with the p110γ helical domain. The interfaces of the p101 GBD with Gβγ, and the p110γ helical domain with Gβγ were determined using computational alphafold2 modeling and HDX-MS. There are distinct differences in the C-terminal domain of p84 and p101, which allows p101 to bind Gβγ subunits, while p84 does not. The two Gβγ interfaces in p110γ and p101 are distinct, revealing how unique mutants of Gβγ cause differential disruption of PI3Kγ complex activation. Overall, our work provides key insight into the molecular basis for how different PI3Kγ complexes are activated.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391 · see citing works
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808 · see citing works
Burke, J. E., Perisic, O., Masson, G. R., Vadas, O., & Williams, R. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1205508109 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Rathinaswamy, M. K., Jenkins, M. L., Duewell, B. R., Zhang, X., Harris, N. J., Evans, J. T., Stariha, J. T. B., Dalwadi, U., Fleming, K. D., Ranga-Prasad, H., Yip, C. K., Williams, R. L., Hansen, S. D., & Burke, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- University of Oregon (US)
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hansen, Scott D.
- Burke, John E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 112172
- ISSN
- 2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10068899
- OpenAlex
- W4322154690
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (T32 GM007759, FDN-143228)
- Cancer Research UK (DRCPGM\\100014)
- NSERC (RGPIN-2018-03951)
- Medical Research Council (MC_U105184308)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (168998)
- Michael Smith Health Research BC (MSFHR- 17686)
- National Science Foundation (MCB-2048060)
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
- Cambridge Overseas Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Keywords
- PI3Kγ, p110γ, P84, G protein-coupled receptors, Ras, Gβγ subunits, membrane recruitment, enzyme activation, immune cells, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, protein complex dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Models, Molecular, Signal Transduction, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review