Cited by 5Tardigrade Biology and EcologyBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyPolar Research and Ecology

A bacterial expression cloning screen reveals single-stranded DNA-binding proteins as potent desicco-protectants

Open access
Hibshman, Jonathan D., Clark-Hachtel, Courtney M., Bloom, Kerry S., Goldstein, Bob·2024·Cell Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Desiccation kills most cells. Some proteins have been identified to help certain cells survive desiccation, but many protein protectants are likely to be unknown. Moreover, the mechanisms ensuring protection of key cellular components are incompletely understood. We devised an expression-cloning approach to discover further protectants. We expressed cDNA libraries from two species of tardigrades in E. coli, and we subjected the bacteria to desiccation to select for survivors. Sequencing the populations of surviving bacteria revealed enrichment of mitochondrial single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (mtSSBs) from both tardigrade species. Expression of mtSSBs in bacteria improved desiccation survival as strongly as the best tardigrade protectants known to date. We found that DNA-binding activity of mtSSBs was necessary and sufficient to improve the desiccation tolerance of bacteria. Although tardigrade mtSSBs were among the strongest protectants we found, single-stranded DNA binding proteins in general offered some protection. These results identify single-stranded DNA-binding proteins as potent desicco-protectants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114956

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hibshman, J. D., Clark-Hachtel, C. M., Bloom, K. S., & Goldstein, B.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Hibshman, Jonathan D.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
114956
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404250079
Cited by
5
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (IOS 2028860)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32GM131577, 5-R01-GM032238-35)
  • University of North Carolina
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Tardigrade Biology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Polar Research and Ecology
Keywords
desiccation tolerance, single-stranded DNA binding protein, mitochondrial single-stranded DNA-binding protein, tardigrades, DNA-binding activity, desiccation survival
MeSH terms
Animals, Cloning, Molecular, Desiccation, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Single-Stranded, Escherichia coli, Gene Library, Tardigrada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review