Unveiling the evolution of antimicrobial peptides in gut microbes via foundation-model-powered framework
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Antimicrobial resistance poses a growing threat to public health, emphasizing the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), short peptide sequences with diverse mechanisms of action, offer a promising alternative due to their broad-spectrum activity against pathogens. Recent advances in protein language models (PLMs) have revolutionized protein structure prediction and functional annotation, highlighting their potential for AMP discovery and therapeutic development. In this context, we present AMP-SEMiner (Antimicrobial Peptide Structural Evolution Miner), an AI-driven framework designed to identify AMPs from metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). By integrating PLMs, structural clustering and evolutionary analysis into the framework, AMP-SEMiner can identify AMPs encoded by small open reading frames (smORFs) and encrypted peptides (EPs), significantly expanding the discovery space. Using this approach, we identified 1,670,600 AMP candidates from diverse habitats. Experimental validation of 29 candidates revealed antimicrobial activity in 18, with 13 surpassing antibiotics in effectiveness. Further analysis of AMPs from human gut microbiomes demonstrated both conserved and adaptive evolutionary strategies, ensuring their functional efficacy in the dynamic gut environment. These findings position AMP-SEMiner as a powerful tool for the discovery and characterization of novel AMPs, with significant potential to drive the development of new antimicrobial therapies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · Cited by 2,598 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · Cited by 2,596 · see citing works
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685 · Cited by 2,523 · see citing works
ProtTrans: Toward Understanding the Language of Life Through Self-Supervised Learning
Elnaggar, A., Heinzinger, M., Dallago, C., Rehawi, G., Wang, Y., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Steinegger, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3095381 · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
The Statistical Trends of Protein Evolution: A Lesson from AlphaFold Database
Tang, Q.-Y., Ren, W., Wang, J., & Kaneko, K. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msac197 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Li, W., Huang, B., Guo, M., Zeng, Z., Cai, T., Feng, L., Zhang, X., Guo, L., Jiang, X., Yin, Y., Wang, E., Huang, X., & Zheng, J.
- Affiliations
- Tongji University (CN)
- Zhejiang Lab (CN)
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- ShanghaiTech University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Ercheng
- Huang, Xingxu
- Zheng, Jinfang
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 115773
- ISSN
- 2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4410801392
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (82450113, 2024SSYS0007)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Keywords
- antimicrobial peptides, protein language models, metagenome-assembled genomes, small open reading frames, gut microbiota, antimicrobial resistance, structural clustering, alternative antimicrobial therapy
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Antimicrobial Peptides, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Evolution, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review