Functional consequences of reductive protein evolution in a minimal eukaryotic genome
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Microsporidia are parasites with the smallest known eukaryotic genomes. The extent of protein loss in these organisms has been well documented, but much less is known about how compaction of microsporidia proteins affects their function. Taking a comparative genomic approach, we identified microsporidia orthologs of budding yeast proteins and show that these orthologs are enriched for essential yeast genes. We show that the median microsporidia protein is 21% shorter than its yeast counterpart and although extensive protein loss occurred after the divergence of microsporidia, reduced protein sizes were already present in microsporidian relatives. Microsporidia proteins are shorter through reduced domain lengths, diminished linker lengths, and domain loss, with 21% of microsporidia orthologs having lost domains present in yeast. On average, 34% of microsporidia orthologs have lost C-terminal residues essential for function in yeast, including 13 essential domains lost per genome. We also found that microsporidia display distinct phylogenetic patterns of domain loss, with losses occurring in a clade-specific manner. To investigate conservation of function, we used yeast complementation assays to test orthologs from several microsporidia species and their relative Rozella allomycis . These experiments reveal that most microsporidia proteins cannot complement their yeast orthologs, the ability to complement is about three-fold less than observed for R. allomycis orthologs, and proteins that do not complement are more reduced in length than their yeast orthologs. Altogether, our results demonstrate the drastic reduction of microsporidia proteins and show that these reductions have resulted in functional divergence from their fungal ancestors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics
Emms, D. M., & Kelly, S. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y · Cited by 7,676 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · Cited by 2,598 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · Cited by 2,596 · see citing works
Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide–protein docking
Tsaban, T., Varga, J. K., Avraham, O., Ben-Aharon, Z., Khramushin, A., & Schueler-Furman, O. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27838-9 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
An Updated Collection of Sequence Barcoded Temperature-Sensitive Alleles of Yeast Essential Genes
Kofoed, M., Milbury, K. L., Chiang, J. H., Sinha, S., Ben-Aroya, S., Giaever, G., Nislow, C., Hieter, P., & Stirling, P. C. (2015) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.115.019174 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Jiang, J., Qu, R., Grigorescu, M., Zhao, W., Yu, Q. Y., Shreenidhi, P. M., Tamim El Jarkass, H., & Reinke, A. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Reinke, Aaron W.
- Venue
- Cell Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-10
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 116333
- ISSN
- 2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4414478190
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (FG2019-12040)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (400784)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- microsporidia, functional complementation, protein domain architecture, genome reduction, protein evolution
- MeSH terms
- Fungal Proteins, Phylogeny, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genome, Fungal, Microsporidia, Evolution, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review