Differential Aging Analysis in Human Cerebral Cortex Identifies Variants in TMEM106B and GRN that Regulate Aging Phenotypes
Open accessAbstract
Human age-associated traits, such as cognitive decline, can be highly variable across the population, with some individuals exhibiting traits that are not expected at a given chronological age. Here we present differential aging (Δ-aging), an unbiased method that quantifies individual variability in age-associated phenotypes within a tissue of interest, and apply this approach to the analysis of existing transcriptome-wide cerebral cortex gene expression data from several cohorts totaling 1,904 autopsied human brain samples. We subsequently performed a genome-wide association study and identified the TMEM106B and GRN gene loci, previously associated with frontotemporal dementia, as determinants of Δ-aging in the cerebral cortex with genome-wide significance. TMEM106B risk variants are associated with inflammation, neuronal loss, and cognitive deficits, even in the absence of known brain disease, and their impact is highly selective for the frontal cerebral cortex of older individuals (>65 years). The methodological framework we describe can be broadly applied to the analysis of quantitative traits associated with aging or with other parameters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GRN and TMEM106B are reportedly potential genetic risk factors for differential aging in the cerebral cortex and cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinson's disease.
“For instance, GRN and TMEM106B are reportedly potential genetic risk factors for differential aging in the cerebral cortex42 and cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis43 and Parkinson’s disease44,45.”
From New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (2022) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 130
- Authors
- Rhinn, H., & Abeliovich, A.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Abeliovich, Asa
- Venue
- Cell Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 404-415.e5
- ISSN
- 2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2596014457
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIA (AG042317)
- NINDS
- Michael J. Fox Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- differential aging, TMEM106B, gene regulatory networks, cerebral cortex, brain aging, frontotemporal dementia, cognitive decline, brain transcriptome, gene expression, neuroinflammation, neuronal loss, genome-wide association study, frontal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Progranulins, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Membrane Proteins, Nerve Degeneration, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Phenotype, Cohort Studies, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome-Wide Association Study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review