Cited by 130Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Differential Aging Analysis in Human Cerebral Cortex Identifies Variants in TMEM106B and GRN that Regulate Aging Phenotypes

Open access
Rhinn, Herve, Abeliovich, Asa·2017·Cell Systems

Abstract

Human age-associated traits, such as cognitive decline, can be highly variable across the population, with some individuals exhibiting traits that are not expected at a given chronological age. Here we present differential aging (Δ-aging), an unbiased method that quantifies individual variability in age-associated phenotypes within a tissue of interest, and apply this approach to the analysis of existing transcriptome-wide cerebral cortex gene expression data from several cohorts totaling 1,904 autopsied human brain samples. We subsequently performed a genome-wide association study and identified the TMEM106B and GRN gene loci, previously associated with frontotemporal dementia, as determinants of Δ-aging in the cerebral cortex with genome-wide significance. TMEM106B risk variants are associated with inflammation, neuronal loss, and cognitive deficits, even in the absence of known brain disease, and their impact is highly selective for the frontal cerebral cortex of older individuals (>65 years). The methodological framework we describe can be broadly applied to the analysis of quantitative traits associated with aging or with other parameters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cels.2017.02.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GRN and TMEM106B are reportedly potential genetic risk factors for differential aging in the cerebral cortex and cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinson's disease.

    “For instance, GRN and TMEM106B are reportedly potential genetic risk factors for differential aging in the cerebral cortex42 and cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis43 and Parkinson’s disease44,45.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 130

Authors
Rhinn, H., & Abeliovich, A.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Abeliovich, Asa
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
404-415.e5
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2596014457
Cited by
130
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIA (AG042317)
  • NINDS
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
differential aging, TMEM106B, gene regulatory networks, cerebral cortex, brain aging, frontotemporal dementia, cognitive decline, brain transcriptome, gene expression, neuroinflammation, neuronal loss, genome-wide association study, frontal cortex
MeSH terms
Progranulins, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Membrane Proteins, Nerve Degeneration, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Phenotype, Cohort Studies, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review