Cited by 15RNA modifications and cancerGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA Research and Splicing

PROBer Provides a General Toolkit for Analyzing Sequencing-Based Toeprinting Assays

Open access
Li, Bo, Tambe, Akshay, Aviran, Sharon, Pachter, Lior·2017·Cell Systems

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A number of sequencing-based transcriptase drop-off assays have recently been developed to probe post-transcriptional dynamics of RNA-protein interaction, RNA structure, and RNA modification. Although these assays survey a diverse set of epitranscriptomic marks, we use the term toeprinting assays since they share methodological similarities. Their interpretation is predicated on addressing a similar computational challenge: how to learn isoform-specific chemical modification profiles in the face of complex read multi-mapping. We introduce PROBer, a statistical model and associated software, that addresses this challenge for the analysis of toeprinting assays. PROBer takes sequencing data as input and outputs estimated transcript abundances and isoform-specific modification profiles. Results on both simulated and biological data demonstrate that PROBer significantly outperforms individual methods tailored for specific toeprinting assays. Since the space of toeprinting assays is ever expanding and these assays are likely to be performed and analyzed together, we believe PROBer's unified data analysis solution will be valuable to the RNA community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cels.2017.04.007

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Li, B., Tambe, A., Aviran, S., & Pachter, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Pachter, Lior
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
568-574.e7
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612260255
Cited by
15
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Systems (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (R01 HG006129, R00 HG006860, P50GM102706, GM08295)
  • Center for RNA Systems Biology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
RNA-protein interactions, RNA structure, RNA modification, epitranscriptomics, transcript abundance estimation, statistical models, RNA sequencing data analysis
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Humans, RNA, RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional, Software, Models, Statistical, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Computational Biology, Protein Isoforms, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review