Cited by 185Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Inferring Causal Gene Regulatory Networks from Coupled Single-Cell Expression Dynamics Using Scribe

Open access
Qiu, Xiaojie, Rahimzamani, Arman, Wang, Li, Ren, Bingcheng, Mao, Qi, Durham, Timothy, McFaline-Figueroa, José L., Saunders, Lauren +2 more·2020·Cell Systems

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Here, we present Scribe (https://github.com/aristoteleo/Scribe-py), a toolkit for detecting and visualizing causal regulatory interactions between genes and explore the potential for single-cell experiments to power network reconstruction. Scribe employs restricted directed information to determine causality by estimating the strength of information transferred from a potential regulator to its downstream target. We apply Scribe and other leading approaches for causal network reconstruction to several types of single-cell measurements and show that there is a dramatic drop in performance for "pseudotime"-ordered single-cell data compared with true time-series data. We demonstrate that performing causal inference requires temporal coupling between measurements. We show that methods such as "RNA velocity" restore some degree of coupling through an analysis of chromaffin cell fate commitment. These analyses highlight a shortcoming in experimental and computational methods for analyzing gene regulation at single-cell resolution and suggest ways of overcoming it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cels.2020.02.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 185

Authors
Qiu, X., Rahimzamani, A., Wang, L., Ren, B., Mao, Q., Durham, T., McFaline-Figueroa, J. L., Saunders, L., Trapnell, C., & Kannan, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • Hunan Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Trapnell, Cole
  • Kannan, Sreeram
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
265-274.e11
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010569643
Cited by
185
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8
FWCI
8.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Systems (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
causal inference, network inference, pseudotime, RNA velocity, chromaffin cells, lineage commitment, temporal coupling
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, RNA, Software, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Gene Regulatory Networks, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review