Inferring Causal Gene Regulatory Networks from Coupled Single-Cell Expression Dynamics Using Scribe
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Here, we present Scribe (https://github.com/aristoteleo/Scribe-py), a toolkit for detecting and visualizing causal regulatory interactions between genes and explore the potential for single-cell experiments to power network reconstruction. Scribe employs restricted directed information to determine causality by estimating the strength of information transferred from a potential regulator to its downstream target. We apply Scribe and other leading approaches for causal network reconstruction to several types of single-cell measurements and show that there is a dramatic drop in performance for "pseudotime"-ordered single-cell data compared with true time-series data. We demonstrate that performing causal inference requires temporal coupling between measurements. We show that methods such as "RNA velocity" restore some degree of coupling through an analysis of chromaffin cell fate commitment. These analyses highlight a shortcoming in experimental and computational methods for analyzing gene regulation at single-cell resolution and suggest ways of overcoming it.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pseudotime-based GRN inference approaches generally have inferior performance to those that rely solely on scRNA-seq data.
“Although there exist other GRN inference approaches based on pseudotime analysis,23,24,25 their performance is generally inferior to those that rely solely on the scRNA-seq data.13”
From SCING: Inference of robust, interpretable gene regulatory networks from single cell and spatial transcriptomics (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 185
- Authors
- Qiu, X., Rahimzamani, A., Wang, L., Ren, B., Mao, Q., Durham, T., McFaline-Figueroa, J. L., Saunders, L., Trapnell, C., & Kannan, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- Hunan Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Trapnell, Cole
- Kannan, Sreeram
- Venue
- Cell Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-274.e11
- ISSN
- 2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7223477
- OpenAlex
- W3010569643
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Systems (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- causal inference, network inference, pseudotime, RNA velocity, chromaffin cells, lineage commitment, temporal coupling
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, RNA, Software, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Gene Regulatory Networks, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review