Personalized Genome-Scale Metabolic Models Identify Targets of Redox Metabolism in Radiation-Resistant Tumors
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Redox cofactor production is integral toward antioxidant generation, clearance of reactive oxygen species, and overall tumor response to ionizing radiation treatment. To identify systems-level alterations in redox metabolism that confer resistance to radiation therapy, we developed a bioinformatics pipeline for integrating multi-omics data into personalized genome-scale flux balance analysis models of 716 radiation-sensitive and 199 radiation-resistant tumors. These models collectively predicted that radiation-resistant tumors reroute metabolic flux to increase mitochondrial NADPH stores and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging. Simulated genome-wide knockout screens agreed with experimental siRNA gene knockdowns in matched radiation-sensitive and radiation-resistant cancer cell lines, revealing gene targets involved in mitochondrial NADPH production, central carbon metabolism, and folate metabolism that allow for selective inhibition of glutathione production and H 2 O 2 clearance in radiation-resistant cancers. This systems approach represents a significant advancement in developing quantitative genome-scale models of redox metabolism and identifying personalized metabolic targets for improving radiation sensitivity in individual cancer patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 105 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Lewis, J. E., Forshaw, T. E., Boothman, D. A., Furdui, C. M., & Kemp, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kemp, Melissa L.
- Venue
- Cell Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-81.e11
- ISSN
- 2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7905848
- OpenAlex
- W3121785319
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 105
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Systems (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Comprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center (P30 CA12197)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (/NCI U01 CA215848, F30 CA224968)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
- Keywords
- radioresistance (biology), redox metabolism, genome-scale metabolic models, precision oncology, reactive oxygen species scavenging, glutathione synthesis, folate metabolism, central carbon metabolism, multi-omics integration, ionizing radiation, cancer cell lines
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Hydrogen Peroxide, NADP, Neoplasms, Oxidation-Reduction, Reactive Oxygen Species
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review