A framework for ultra-low-input spatial tissue proteomics
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
ABSTRACT Spatial tissue proteomics combining microscopy-based cell phenotyping with ultra-sensitive mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is an emerging and powerful concept for the study of cell function and heterogeneity in health and disease. However, optimized workflows that preserve morphological information for image-based phenotype discovery and maximize proteome coverage of few or even single cells from laser microdissected archival tissue, are currently lacking. Here, we report a robust and scalable workflow for the proteomic analysis of ultra-low input formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material. Benchmarking in the murine liver resulted in up to 2,000 quantified proteins from single hepatocyte contours and nearly 5,000 proteins from 50-cell regions with high quantitative reproducibility. Applied to human tonsil, we profiled 146 microregions including spatially defined T and B lymphocyte niches and quantified cell type specific markers, cytokines, immune cell regulators and transcription factors. These rich data also highlighted proteome dynamics in spatially defined zones of activated germinal centers, illuminating sites undergoing active B-cell proliferation and somatic hypermutation. Our results demonstrate the power of spatially-resolved proteomics for tissue phenotyping by integrating high-content imaging, laser microdissection, and ultra-sensitive mass spectrometry. This approach has broad implications for a wide range of biomedical applications, including early disease profiling, drug target discovery and biomarker research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Makhmut, A., Qin, D., Fritzsche, S., Nimo, J., König, J., & Coscia, F.
- Affiliations
- Max Delbrück Center (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Coscia, Fabian
- Venue
- Cell Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1002-1014.e5
- ISSN
- 2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4388103718
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (161L0222)
- Federal Ministry of Education and Research Berlin Office
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- spatial proteomics, laser microdissection, single-cell proteomics, archival tissue, hepatocytes, human tonsil, germinal center, B cell activation, somatic hypermutation, cellular heterogeneity, proteome coverage
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Mass Spectrometry, Proteome, Proteomics, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review