Cited by 35Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and Dynamics

AlphaFold2 enables accurate deorphanization of ligands to single-pass receptors

Open access
Banhos Danneskiold-Samsøe, Niels, Kavi, Deniz, Jude, Kevin M., Nissen, Silas Boye, Wat, Lianna W., Coassolo, Laetitia, Zhao, Meng, Santana-Oikawa, Galia Asae +3 more·2024·Cell Systems

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Secreted proteins play crucial roles in paracrine and endocrine signaling; however, identifying ligand-receptor interactions remains challenging. Here, we benchmarked AlphaFold2 (AF2) as a screening approach to identify extracellular ligands to single-pass transmembrane receptors. Key to the approach is the optimization of AF2 input and output for screening ligands against receptors to predict the most probable ligand-receptor interactions. The predictions were performed on ligand-receptor pairs not used for AF2 training. We demonstrate high discriminatory power and a success rate of close to 90% for known ligand-receptor pairs and 50% for a diverse set of experimentally validated interactions. Further, we show that screen accuracy does not correlate linearly with prediction of ligand-receptor interaction. These results demonstrate a proof of concept of a rapid and accurate screening platform to predict high-confidence cell-surface receptors for a diverse set of ligands by structural binding prediction, with potentially wide applicability for the understanding of cell-cell communication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cels.2024.10.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AlphaFold-Multimer is being used to uncover protein-protein interactions on the scale of pathways and organisms.

    “AF-M is being used to uncover PPIs on the scale of pathways and organisms15–24.”

    From Predictomes, a classifier-curated database of AlphaFold-modeled protein-protein interactions (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Methods (‘Predicting structures’) describe using AlphaFold 2.2.4 to predict ligand–receptor complexes, and the Results (‘Performance using experimentally validated extracellular protein interactions’) report screening 3,401 protein pairs. This supports the use of AlphaFold to uncover PPIs at scale, but the paper studies selected extracellular interactions, not PPIs across whole pathways or organisms. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 35

Authors
Banhos Danneskiold-Samsøe, N., Kavi, D., Jude, K. M., Nissen, S. B., Wat, L. W., Coassolo, L., Zhao, M., Santana-Oikawa, G. A., Broido, B. B., Garcia, K. C., & Svensson, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Svensson, Katrin J.
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1046-1060.e3
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404303937
Cited by
35
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Systems (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (R01GM150125)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF20OC0059462, NNF21CC0073729)
  • National Institutes of Health (P30DK116074)
  • American Heart Association (23IPA1042031)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK125260)
  • Carlsbergfondet
  • Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, School of Medicine, Stanford University
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  • Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute
  • School of Medicine, Stanford University
  • Cardiovascular Institute of Philadelphia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
AlphaFold2, ligand-receptor interactions, deorphanization, secreted proteins, ligand screening, cell surface receptors, intercellular communication, benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review