FlowDesign: Improved design of antibody CDRs through flow matching and better prior distributions
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Designing antibodies with desired binding specificity and affinity is essential for pharmaceutical research. While diffusion-based models have advanced the co-design of the complementarity-determining region (CDR) sequences and structures, challenges remain, including non-informative priors, incompatibility with discrete amino acid types, and impractical computational costs in large-scale sampling. To address these, we propose FlowDesign, a sequence-structure co-design approach via flow matching, offering (1) flexible prior selection, (2) direct matching of discrete distributions, and (3) enhanced efficiency for large-scale sampling. By leveraging various priors, data-driven structural models proved the most informative. FlowDesign outperformed baselines in amino acid recovery (AAR), root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), and Rosetta energy. We also applied FlowDesign to design antibodies targeting the HIV-1 receptor CD4. FlowDesign yielded antibodies with improved binding affinity and neutralizing potency compared with the antibody ibalizumab across multiple HIV mutants, validated by biolayer interferometry (BLI) and pseudovirus neutralization. This highlights FlowDesign's potential in antibody and protein design. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.09.519842 · Cited by 2,369 · see citing works
De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · Cited by 2,325 · see citing works
ProGen2: Exploring the boundaries of protein language models
Nijkamp, E., Ruffolo, J. A., Weinstein, E. N., Naik, N., & Madani, A. (2023) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2023.10.002 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
RosettaAntibodyDesign (RAbD): a general framework for computational antibody design
Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Kalyuzhniy, O., Kubitz, M., Weitzner, B. D., Hu, X., Adachi, Y., Schief, W. R., & Dunbrack, R. L. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Lapidoth, G. D., Baran, D., Pszolla, G. M., Norn, C., Alon, A., Tyka, M. D., & Fleishman, S. J. (2015) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.24779 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Pantazes, R. J., & Maranas, C. D. (2010) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzq061 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Wu, J., Kong, X., Sun, N., Wei, J., Shan, S., Feng, F., Wu, F., Peng, J., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., & Ma, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Yang
- Ma, Jianzhu
- Venue
- Cell Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 101270
- ISSN
- 2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409921893
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Systems (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
- National Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational Research (2022YFF1203100)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- antibody design, hypervariable region, flow matching, prior distributions, neutralizing antibodies, ibalizumab, pseudovirus neutralization, biolayer interferometry, protein design
- MeSH terms
- Antibodies, Humans, HIV Antibodies, HIV-1, Complementarity Determining Regions, Antibodies, Neutralizing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review