Cited by 2Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchT-cell and B-cell Immunologyvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Learning antibody sequence constraints from allelic inclusion

Open access
Jagota, Milind, Hsu, Chloe, Mazumder, Thomas, Sung, Kevin, DeWitt, William S., Listgarten, Jennifer, Matsen IV, Frederick A., Ye, Chun Jimmie +1 more·2025·Cell Systems

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Although antibody sequences are highly diverse, they are constrained by requirements for expression and limited off-target reactivity. Describing which sequences violate such constraints has proven to be difficult. Here, we introduce a machine-learning framework to leverage a previously underutilized source of data for this problem. We use human single-cell sequencing data to find instances of allelic inclusion, a rare event where B cells express two different antibody light chains as mRNA. Previous studies suggest that one of these chains is either autoreactive or non-expressing as protein. We train machine-learning models to identify abnormal sequences associated with allelic inclusion. The resulting models generalize to predict antibody properties including polyreactivity, surface expression, and mutation usage, outperforming methods that do not use allelic inclusion data. We also investigate similar selection forces on the heavy chain in mice and observe that surrogate light-chain pairing has a large impact on heavy-chain diversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cels.2025.101368

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jagota, M., Hsu, C., Mazumder, T., Sung, K., DeWitt, W. S., Listgarten, J., Matsen IV, F. A., Ye, C. J., & Song, Y. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Innovative Genomics Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Song, Yun S.
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-09
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
101368
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413138774
Cited by
2
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Systems (acceptedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of California Berkeley Peder Sather Center for Advanced Study
  • National Institutes of Health
  • NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35-GM134922)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
antibody light chain, B cells, autoreactivity, polyreactivity, cell surface expression, surrogate light chain, single-cell RNA sequencing, machine learning prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review