Anomaly detection for high-content image-based phenotypic cell profiling
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
High-content image-based phenotypic profiling combines automated microscopy and analysis to identify phenotypic alterations in cell morphology and provide insight into the cell's physiological state. Classical representations of the phenotypic profile cannot capture the full underlying complexity in cell organization, while recent weakly supervised machine-learning-based representation-learning methods are hard to biologically interpret. We used the abundance of control wells to learn the in-distribution of control experiments and used it to formulate a self-supervised reconstruction anomaly-based representation that encodes the intricate morphological inter-feature dependencies while preserving the representation interpretability. The performance of our anomaly-based representations was evaluated for downstream tasks with respect to two classical representations across four public Cell Painting datasets. Anomaly-based representations improved reproducibility and mechanism of action classification and complemented classical representations. Unsupervised explainability of autoencoder-based anomalies identified specific inter-feature dependencies causing anomalies. The general concept of anomaly-based representations can be adapted to other applications in cell biology. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics
Luecken, M. D., Büttner, M., Chaichoompu, K., Danese, A., Interlandi, M., Mueller, M. F., Strobl, D. C., Zappia, L., Dugas, M., Colomé-Tatché, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01336-8 · Cited by 1,438 · see citing works
Bray, M.-A., Singh, S., Han, H., Davis, C. T., Borgeson, B., Hartland, C., Kost-Alimova, M., Gustafsdottir, S. M., Gibson, C. C., & Carpenter, A. E. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.105 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Towards reproducible computational drug discovery
Schaduangrat, N., Lampa, S., Simeon, S., Gleeson, M. P., Spjuth, O., & Nantasenamat, C. (2020) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-0408-x · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Integrated intracellular organization and its variations in human iPS cells
Viana, M. P., Chen, J., Knijnenburg, T. A., Vasan, R., Yan, C., Arakaki, J. E., Bailey, M., Berry, B., Borensztejn, A., Brown, E. M., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05563-7 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Evaluating batch correction methods for image-based cell profiling
Arevalo, J., Su, E., van Dijk, R., Carpenter, A. E., & Singh, S. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.15.558001 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Shpigler, A., Kolet, N., Golan, S., Weisbart, E., & Zaritsky, A.
- Affiliations
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Jerusalem College of Technology (IL)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zaritsky, Assaf
- Venue
- Cell Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 101429
- ISSN
- 2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11185510
- OpenAlex
- W4415668568
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Israel Science Foundation (2516/21)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41 GM135019)
- Ministry of Innovation, Science and Technology
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Israel
- Delta
- Wellcome Leap
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Keywords
- anomaly detection, high-content imaging, phenotypic profiling, cell morphology, Cell Painting, self-supervised reconstruction, interpretability, representation learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review