The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New insights from reactivity testing of supplementary cementitious materials
Abstract
Abstract Tests to determine the reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) by using isothermal calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis have been proposed. In one such test, the heat release and calcium hydroxide consumption of SCMs mixed with calcium hydroxide (3:1 ratio of calcium hydroxide and SCM) at 50 °C in a 0.5 M potassium hydroxide environment are measured. In this study, we show the results of such testing for a large variety of SCMs and fillers, ranging from conventional materials such as fly ash, slag, silica fume, quartz, and limestone, to alternative materials such as calcined clays, municipal solid waste incineration fly ash, basic oxygen furnace slag, ground lightweight aggregates, ground pumice, ground glass pozzolan, and basalt fines. A total of 54 SCMs are tested using this approach. Results show that even among SCMs of the same type, there is considerable difference in the heat release and calcium hydroxide consumption, likely due to differences in amorphous content, chemical composition, and fineness, leading to different reactivities. Based on the response in the test, SCMs are classified into inert, pozzolanic, and latent hydraulic; the pozzolanic and latent hydraulic materials are further classified into less reactive and more reactive. The relationship between heat release and calcium hydroxide consumption depends on the chemical composition of the SCMs, and SCMs with high calcium, high alumina, and high silica contents show different relationships (determined by the slope of the heat release vs. calcium hydroxide plot).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing, Understanding and Unlocking Supplementary Cementitious Materials
Snellings, R. (2016) · RILEM Technical Letters · doi:10.21809/rilemtechlett.2016.12 · Cited by 348
Increasing the reactivity of metakaolin-cement blends using zinc oxide
Taylor-Lange, S. C., Riding, K. A., & Juenger, M. C. G. (2012) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.03.004 · Cited by 52
Cited by
Neves, J. M., Ramanathan, S., Suraneni, P., Grugel, R., & Radlińska, A. (2020) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120315 · Cited by 53
Self-citationAmitani, A., & Miller, S. A. (2026) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108769 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Suraneni, P., Hajibabaee, A., Ramanathan, S., Wang, Y., & Weiss, J.
- Venue
- Cement and Concrete Composites
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 103
- Pages
- 331-338
- ISSN
- 0958-9465 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2945976904
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New insights from reactivity testing of supplementary cementitious materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.05.017
- The paper
- Suraneni, P., Hajibabaee, A., Ramanathan, S., Wang, Y., & Weiss, J. (2019). New insights from reactivity testing of supplementary cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Composites. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.05.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.