The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance of glass powder as a pozzolanic material in concrete: A field trial on concrete slabs
Open accessAbstract
Earlier laboratory work by the authors indicated satisfactory performance of glass powder (GLP) in concrete as a pozzolanic material. The powder was manufactured from mixed colour waste packaging glass comprising soda-lime glass. In order to investigate the performance of GLP in concrete under field conditions, a field trial was conducted using a 40 MPa concrete mixture, incorporating various proportions of GLP (0%, 20%, and 30%) as cement replacement. Ten mixture formulations, some of which also included sand-size crushed glass aggregate particles, were used to cast ten concrete slabs (1.5 × 2.5 × 0.25 m). Cylinders and prisms were also manufactured from the same batches at the time of casting for the measurement of compressive and splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, shrinkage, expansion, ultrasonic pulse velocity, volume of permeable voids, and chloride permeability. Core samples were drilled from the slabs at various ages for the same tests (except tensile and flexural), as well as for microstructural examination. Results showed that strength gain was slower in GLP-bearing concrete up to 28 days, but at the age of 404 days all the mixtures exceeded the 40 MPa target and achieved about 55 MPa strength. Mixtures containing GLP also performed satisfactorily with respect to drying shrinkage and alkali reactivity, and there were indications that GLP reduces the chloride ion penetrability of the concrete, thereby reducing the risk of chloride induced corrosion of the steel reinforcement in concrete. The results demonstrated that GLP can be incorporated into 40 MPa concrete at dosage rates of 20–30% to replace cement without harmful effects. The use of GLP provides for considerable value-added utilisation of waste glass in concrete and significant reductions in the production of green house gases by the cement industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review on the use of waste glasses in the production of cement and concrete
Shi, C., & Zheng, K. (2007) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.013 · Cited by 549
Evaluation of the durability of concrete made with crushed glass aggregates
de Castro, S., & de Brito, J. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.021 · Cited by 351
Furszyfer Del Rio, D. D., Sovacool, B. K., Foley, A. M., Griffiths, S., Bazilian, M., Kim, J., & Rooney, D. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111885 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Shayan, A., & Xu, A.
- Venue
- Cement and Concrete Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 457-468
- ISSN
- 0008-8846 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965141933
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance of glass powder as a pozzolanic material in concrete: A field trial on concrete slabs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.12.012
- The paper
- Shayan, A., & Xu, A. (2006). Performance of glass powder as a pozzolanic material in concrete: A field trial on concrete slabs. Cement and Concrete Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.12.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.