The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cavitational reactors for process intensification of chemical processing applications: A critical review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review
Mata, T. M., Martins, A. A., & Caetano, N. S. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.020 · Cited by 5,685
Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes based on cavitation—A review
Gągol, M., Przyjazny, A., & Boczkaj, G. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.049 · Cited by 1,222
Gogate, P. R., Sutkar, V. S., & Pandit, A. B. (2011) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.069 · Cited by 555
Self-citationGągol, M., Soltani, R. D. C., Przyjazny, A., & Boczkaj, G. (2019) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.05.027 · Cited by 361
Changes of gallic acid mediated by ultrasound in a model extraction solution
Zhang, Q.-A., Shen, H., Fan, X.-H., Shen, Y., Wang, X., & Song, Y. (2015) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.06.010 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Gogate, P. R.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 515-527
- ISSN
- 0255-2701 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015704580
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cavitational reactors for process intensification of chemical processing applications: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cep.2007.09.014
- The paper
- Gogate, P. R. (2008). Cavitational reactors for process intensification of chemical processing applications: A critical review. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.09.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
