CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 146Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesThermal and Kinetic AnalysisMining and Gasification Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reaction kinetics and mass transfer studies of biomass char gasification with CO2

Mani, Thilakavathi, Mahinpey, Nader, Murugan, Pulikesi·2011·Chemical Engineering Science
DOI 10.1016/j.ces.2010.09.033
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ces.2010.09.033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Ahmed, 2010, Pyrolysis and gasification of food waste: syngas characteristics and char gasification kinetics, Applied Energy, 87, 101, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.08.032 · DOI
  2. Ahn, 2001, Gasification kinetics of an Indonesian sub-bituminous coal–char with CO2 at elevated pressure, Fuel, 80, 1651, 10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00024-2 · DOI
  3. Beamish, 1999, Proximate analysis of New Zealand and Australian coal by thermogravimetry, New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 37, 387, 10.1080/00288306.1994.9514629 · DOI
  4. Bhat, 2001, Kinetics of rice husk char gasification, Energy Conversion Management, 42, 2061, 10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00173-4 · DOI
  5. Cetin, 2005, Biomass gasification kinetics: influences of pressure and char structure, Combustion Science and Technology, 177, 765, 10.1080/00102200590917266 · DOI
  6. Di Blasi, 2009, Combustion and gasification rates of lignocellulosic chars, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 35, 121, 10.1016/j.pecs.2008.08.001 · DOI
  7. Feng, 2002, On the validity of thermogravimetric determination of carbon gasification kinetics, Chemical Engineering Science, 57, 2907, 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00189-6 · DOI
  8. Garcia, 2001, CO2 as a gasifying agent for gas production from pine sawdust at low temperatures using a Ni/Al co-precipitated catalyst, Fuel Processing Technology, 69, 157, 10.1016/S0378-3820(00)00138-7 · DOI
  9. Gøbel, B., Bentzen, J.D., 1999. Dynamic modeling of the two stage gasification process. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Biomass Conference of the Americas, Oakland, CA, USA, pp. 1025–1032.
  10. Gomez-Barea, 2005, Reaction–diffusion model of TGA gasification experiments for estimating diffusional effects, Fuel, 84, 1695
  11. Gomez-Barea, 2006, Diffusional effects in CO2 gasification experiments with single biomass char particles. 1. Experimental investigation, Energy and Fuels, 20, 2202, 10.1021/ef050365a · DOI
  12. Gomez-Barea, 2006, Diffusional effects in CO2 gasification experiments with single biomass char particles. 2. Theoretical predictions, Energy and Fuels, 20, 2211, 10.1021/ef0503663 · DOI
  13. Hodge, 2010, The significance of char morphology to the analysis of high-temperature char-CO2 reaction rates, Energy and Fuels, 24, 100, 10.1021/ef900503x · DOI
  14. Kannan, 1990, Gasification of biomass chars in carbon dioxide: dependence of gasification rate on the indigenous metal content, Fuel, 69, 747, 10.1016/0016-2361(90)90041-N · DOI
  15. Khalil, 2009, CO2 Gasification of biomass chars: a kinetic study, Energy and Fuels, 23, 94, 10.1021/ef800739m · DOI
  16. Klose, 2005, On the intrinsic reaction rate of biomass char gasification with carbon dioxide and steam, Fuel, 84, 885, 10.1016/j.fuel.2004.11.016 · DOI
  17. Mahinepy, 2009, Analysis of bio-oil, biogas, and biochar from pressurized pyrolysis of wheat straw using a tubular reactor, Energy and Fuels, 23, 2736, 10.1021/ef8010959 · DOI
  18. Mayoral, 2001, Different approaches to proximate analysis by thermogravimetry analysis, Thermochim Acta, 370, 91, 10.1016/S0040-6031(00)00789-9 · DOI
  19. Ochoa, 2001, CO2 gasification of Argentinean coal chars: a kinetic characterization, Fuel Processing Technology, 74, 161, 10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00235-1 · DOI
  20. Ollero, 2002, Diffusional effects in TGA gasification experiments for kinetic determination, Fuel, 81, 1989, 10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00126-6 · DOI
  21. Ollero, 2003, The CO2 gasification kinetics of olive residue, Biomass and Bioenergy, 24, 151, 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00091-0 · DOI
  22. Standish, 1988, Gasification of single wood charcoal particles in CO2, Fuel, 67, 666, 10.1016/0016-2361(88)90296-7 · DOI
  23. Thiele, 1939, Relation between catalytic activity and size of particle, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 31, 916, 10.1021/ie50355a027 · DOI
  24. Yang, 1985, Absolute rates of the carbon–carbon dioxide reaction, AIChE Journal, 31, 1313, 10.1002/aic.690310810 · DOI
  25. Zhang, 2010, Modeling of catalytic gasification kinetics of coal char and carbon, Fuel, 89, 152, 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.06.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction

    Nhuchhen, D., Basu, P., & Acharya, B. (2014) · International Journal of Renewable Energy & Biofuels · doi:10.5171/2014.506376 · Cited by 300

    “The gasification rate, which varies with the local heterogeneous reaction between the char and gasifying agent, depends on an intrinsic reaction rate (Mani et al., 2011).”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Mani, T., Mahinpey, N., & Murugan, P.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Mahinpey, Nader
ORCID
Mahinpey, Nader
Venue
Chemical Engineering Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
36-41
ISSN
0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ces.2010.09.033
OpenAlex
W2024067236
Cited by
146
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Mining and Gasification Technologies
Keywords
CO2 gasification, gasification kinetics, mass transfer, intraparticle diffusion, effective diffusion coefficient, effectiveness factor, Thiele modulus, particle size effects, temperature effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review