Modelling of coffee extraction during brewing using multiscale methods: An experimentally validated model
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies have established that particle size, size distribution, and coffee packing bed are parameters that affect and determine diffusion of solids during coffee extraction.
“Recent studies have established that particle size, size distribution, and the coffee packing bed are parameters that affect and determine the diffusion of solids during the coffee extraction process48–50.”
From Effect of grinding, extraction time and type of coffee on the physicochemical and flavour characteristics of cold brew coffee (2019) · cites this paper as [50]
Mathematical modeling of coffee extraction proposed by Moroney et al. suggested that the diffusion of coffee from the intragranular pores to the intergranular pores is the rate limiting process.
“Mathematical modeling of coffee extraction proposed by Moroney, et al.35,45 suggested that the diffusion of coffee from the intragranular pores to the intergranular pores is the rate limiting process.”
From The Effect of Time, Roasting Temperature, and Grind Size on Caffeine and Chlorogenic Acid Concentrations in Cold Brew Coffee (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
Particle distribution is vitally important to coffee extraction, affecting both diffusion of compounds through intragranular pores within grinds and fluid flow between grinds through the intergranular pore network.
“Earlier studies found that particle distribution was vitally important to coffee extraction, affecting both the diffusion of compounds through intragranular pores within grinds, as well as the fluid flow between the grinds (through the intergranular pore network)14,44,45.”
From The Effect of Time, Roasting Temperature, and Grind Size on Caffeine and Chlorogenic Acid Concentrations in Cold Brew Coffee (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
The results of this study validate earlier models proposed by Moroney et al. and Spiro and Seldwood and extend their findings into cold brew extraction over long time periods.
“The results of this study validate earlier models proposed by by Moroney et al.35,45 and Spiro and Seldwood52 and extend their findings into cold brew extraction over long time periods.”
From The Effect of Time, Roasting Temperature, and Grind Size on Caffeine and Chlorogenic Acid Concentrations in Cold Brew Coffee (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Moroney, K. M., Lee, W. T., O׳Brien, S. B. G., Suijver, F., & Marra, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Limerick (IE)
- Philips (Netherlands) (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Moroney, K.M.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 137
- Pages
- 216-234
- ISSN
- 0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W592275239
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Science Foundation Ireland Investigator Award 12/IA/1683
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
- Keywords
- coffee extraction, coffee brewing, dual-porosity model, multiscale modeling, volume averaging, solute transport
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review