Cited by 78Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaCoffee research and impactsGranular flow and fluidized beds

Modelling of coffee extraction during brewing using multiscale methods: An experimentally validated model

Moroney, K.M., Lee, W.T., O׳Brien, S.B.G., Suijver, F., Marra, J.·2015·Chemical Engineering Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ces.2015.06.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 78

Authors
Moroney, K. M., Lee, W. T., O׳Brien, S. B. G., Suijver, F., & Marra, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Limerick (IE)
  • Philips (Netherlands) (NL)
Corresponding author
Moroney, K.M.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
137
Pages
216-234
ISSN
0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W592275239
Cited by
78
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland Investigator Award 12/IA/1683
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
Keywords
coffee extraction, coffee brewing, dual-porosity model, multiscale modeling, volume averaging, solute transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review