Simple method for measuring the spectral absorption cross-section of microalgae
Open accessAbstract
The spectral absorption cross-section of microalgae is an essential parameter in modeling the microalgae metabolism and growth kinetics as well as in estimating the productivity and efficiency of photobioreactors. This paper presents a simple experimental procedure for retrieving the average spectral absorption cross-section of concentrated microalgal suspensions. The method combines experimental measurements of the normal–hemispherical transmittance and reflectance of the suspensions in conventional cuvettes with an inverse method and analytical expressions obtained from the modified two-flux approximation accounting for absorption and multiple scattering. The method was validated with direct measurements of the scattering phase function and of the absorption and scattering cross-sections of freshwater microalgae Chlorella vulgaris . It was able to retrieve the absorption cross-section with acceptable accuracy. The latter was then used to estimate successfully the fluence rate using a simplified light transfer model, the local rate of photon absorption , and the biomass productivity in flat plate PBRs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scattering must be analyzed within thin suspensions to avoid multiple scattering events that would blur the analysis of one single scattering event.
“Moreover, the scattering must be analyzed within thin suspensions to avoid multiple scattering events that would blur the analysis of one single scattering event [45-47].”
From Comprehensive Computational Model for Coupled Fluid Flow, Mass Transfer, and Light Supply in Tubular Photobioreactors Equipped with Glass Sponges (2022) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Kandilian, R., Soulies, A., Pruvost, J., Rousseau, B., Legrand, J., & Pilon, L.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pilon, Laurent
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 146
- Pages
- 357-368
- ISSN
- 0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2292162435
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- College of Natural Resources and Sciences, Humboldt State University
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-12-BIME-0001-02)
- Conseil Régional des Pays de la Loire
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Radiative Heat Transfer Studies
- Keywords
- microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris, reflectivity, inverse method, multiple scattering, phase function, fluence rate, photobioreactors, biomass productivity, microalgae growth kinetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review