Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimentally validated predictive PI-PD control strategy for delay-dominant chemical processes

Singha, Prabir, Das, Dipjyoti, Chakraborty, Sudipta, Lloyds Raja, G.·2024·Chemical Engineering Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ces.2024.120197

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Singha, P., Das, D., Chakraborty, S., & Lloyds Raja, G.
Affiliations
National Institute Of Technology Silchar (IN)
Corresponding author
Chakraborty, Sudipta
Venue
Chemical Engineering Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
295
Pages
120197
ISSN
0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396608454
Cited by
42
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 9
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Keywords
Smith predictor, time-delay systems, moment matching, maximum sensitivity, phase margin, robust control, parameter uncertainty, stirred tank reactor, heat exchangers, experimental validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimentally validated predictive PI-PD control strategy for delay-dominant chemical processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ces.2024.120197
The paper
Singha, P., Das, D., Chakraborty, S., & Lloyds Raja, G. (2024). Experimentally validated predictive PI-PD control strategy for delay-dominant chemical processes. Chemical Engineering Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2024.120197

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.