Cited by 505Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesElder Abuse and Neglect

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 259 of the 264 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Substance Abuse Among Older Adults

Open access
Kuerbis, Alexis, Sacco, Paul, Blazer, Dan G., Moore, Alison A.·2014·Clinics in Geriatric Medicine

Abstract

Although the myth that older adults do not use mood-altering substances persists, evidence suggests that substance use among older adults has been underidentified for decades. The baby boom generation is unique in its exposure to, attitudes toward, and prevalence of substance use-causing projected rates of substance use to increase over the next twenty years. Given their unique biological vulnerabilities and life stage, older adults who misuse substances require special attention. Prevalence rates of substance use and misuse among older adults, methods of screening and assessment unique to older adults, and treatment options for older adults are reviewed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cger.2014.04.008

Cites

259 of 259 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 264 references

5 of the 264 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brown, 1995, Conjoint screening questionnaires for alcohol and other drug abuse, Wis Med J, 94, 135
  2. Blow, 1992, The Michigan Alcohol Screening Test: Geriatric Version (MAST-G): a new elderly specific screening instrument, Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 16, 172

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 505

Metadata

Authors
Kuerbis, A., Sacco, P., Blazer, D. G., & Moore, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Kuerbis, Alexis
Venue
Clinics in Geriatric Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
629-654
ISSN
0749-0690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998499579
Cited by
505
References
264
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinics in Geriatric Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K24AA015957)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG028748, P30AG021684)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
substance abuse, older adults, substance use prevalence, baby boomers, screening evaluation, addiction treatment, biological vulnerability, life stages
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Humans, Risk Factors, Global Health, Prevalence, Risk Assessment, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review